Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Rice

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Rate of Violent Crime per 1,000 Population

Current Value:
2.0
Crimes per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (4.4), Rice has a value of 2.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(4.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.7), Rice has a value of 2.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.7 in 2015)
The Kansas State value is compared to the US value. Under reporting of crime by some public safety jurisdictions may result in lower rates.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (2.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.4).
Prior Value
(2.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Rice Average Household Size

2.30
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (2.50), Rice has a value of 2.30.
KS Value
(2.50)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Rice has a value of 2.30.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Female Population

Current Value:

County: Rice Female Population

49.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (49.8%), Rice has a value of 49.3%.
KS Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.4%), Rice has a value of 49.3%.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (49.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (49.2%).
Prior Value
(49.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Rice Foreign Born Persons

3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (7.1%), Rice has a value of 3.9%.
KS Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Rice has a value of 3.9%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Households

Current Value:

County: Rice Households

3,763
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Male Population

Current Value:

County: Rice Male Population

50.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (50.2%), Rice has a value of 50.7%.
KS Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.6%), Rice has a value of 50.7%.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (50.7%) is less  than the previously measured value (50.8%).
Prior Value
(50.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Population Age 5+ with Language Other than English Spoken at Home

6.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (11.8%), Rice has a value of 6.5%.
KS Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Rice has a value of 6.5%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Population American Indian and Alaska Native

Current Value:
1.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (1.2%), Rice has a value of 1.5%.
KS Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Rice has a value of 1.5%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (1.5%) is greater  than the previously measured value (1.4%).
Prior Value
(1.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Population Asian

Current Value:

County: Rice Population Asian

1.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (3.2%), Rice has a value of 1.1%.
KS Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.3%), Rice has a value of 1.1%.
US Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (1.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.1%).
Prior Value
(1.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Population Black or African American

Current Value:
2.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (6.2%), Rice has a value of 2.0%.
KS Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Rice has a value of 2.0%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (2.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (1.9%).
Prior Value
(1.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Population Hispanic or Latino

Current Value:
12.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (13.0%), Rice has a value of 12.2%.
KS Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.1%), Rice has a value of 12.2%.
US Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (12.2%) is greater  than the previously measured value (11.8%).
Prior Value
(11.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander

0.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (0.2%), Rice has a value of 0.1%.
KS Value
(0.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.3%), Rice has a value of 0.1%.
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (0.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.1%).
Prior Value
(0.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Population Over Age 65

Current Value:

County: Rice Population Over Age 65

20.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (17.2%), Rice has a value of 20.5%.
KS Value
(17.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.3%), Rice has a value of 20.5%.
US Value
(17.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (20.5%) is greater  than the previously measured value (20.1%).
Prior Value
(20.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Current Value:
1,861
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Population Two or More Races

Current Value:
2.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (3.3%), Rice has a value of 2.6%.
KS Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.0%), Rice has a value of 2.6%.
US Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (2.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (2.7%).
Prior Value
(2.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Population Under Age 18

Current Value:
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (23.5%), Rice has a value of 23.0%.
KS Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Rice has a value of 23.0%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (23.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (23.1%).
Prior Value
(23.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Population Under Age 5

Current Value:

County: Rice Population Under Age 5

5.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (6.0%), Rice has a value of 5.6%.
KS Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.6%), Rice has a value of 5.6%.
US Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (5.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.6%).
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Population White

Current Value:

County: Rice Population White

92.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (85.9%), Rice has a value of 92.6%.
KS Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (75.5%), Rice has a value of 92.6%.
US Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (92.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (92.7%).
Prior Value
(92.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)

Current Value:
82.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (74.3%), Rice has a value of 82.1%.
KS Value
(74.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.9%), Rice has a value of 82.1%.
US Value
(58.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (82.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (82.5%).
Prior Value
(82.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Ratio of Children to Adults

Current Value:
30.9
Children per 100 Adults
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (31.2), Rice has a value of 30.9.
KS Value
(31.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (28.9), Rice has a value of 30.9.
US Value
(28.9 in 2014)
The State value is compared to U.S. Value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (30.9) is greater  than the previously measured value (30.7).
Prior Value
(30.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Ratio of Elderly Persons and Children to Adults

64.0
Elderly persons & children per 100 adults
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (57.7), Rice has a value of 64.0.
KS Value
(57.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.7), Rice has a value of 64.0.
US Value
(50.7 in 2014)
The Kansas State Value is compared to the US Value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (64.0) is greater  than the previously measured value (62.6).
Prior Value
(62.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Ratio of Elderly Persons to Adults

Current Value:
33.1
Elderly persons per 100 adults
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (26.4), Rice has a value of 33.1.
KS Value
(26.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.8), Rice has a value of 33.1.
US Value
(23.8 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (33.1) is greater  than the previously measured value (32.0).
Prior Value
(32.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Total Population

Current Value:

County: Rice Total Population

9,260
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rice (9,260) is less  than the previously measured value (9,370).
Prior Value
(9,370)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Rice Veteran Population

9.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (7.4%), Rice has a value of 9.3%.
KS Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Rice has a value of 9.3%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:
14.3%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (19.9%), Rice has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(19.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Rice has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (14.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.5%).
Prior Value
(12.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:
29.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 29.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 29.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (28.8%), Rice has a value of 29.8% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Rice has a value of 29.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:
555
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Social Associations

Current Value:

County: Rice Social Associations

19.2
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 19.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 17.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.6.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 19.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (13.2), Rice has a value of 19.2 which is higher and better.
KS Value
(13.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.1), Rice has a value of 19.2 which is higher and better.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (19.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.2).
Prior Value
(19.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Community / Social Tolerance

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Community / Social Tolerance

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Social Vulnerability Index

Current Value:
0.8
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 0.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.8.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (0.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0.7).
Prior Value
(0.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Community Spending on Transportation

Current Value:
19.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (18.1%), Rice has a value of 19.9%.
KS Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.4%), Rice has a value of 19.9%.
US Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (19.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.9%).
Prior Value
(19.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio

4.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 4.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 4.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (3.4%), Rice has a value of 4.1% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (4.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.9%).
Prior Value
(3.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Households without a Vehicle

Current Value:
2.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.6%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (5.1%), Rice has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Rice has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:
19.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 19.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 19.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (19.7), Rice has a value of 19.7.
KS Value
(19.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Rice has a value of 19.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Current Value:
29.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 29.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.1%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 29.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (21.6%), Rice has a value of 29.7% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(21.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Rice has a value of 29.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (29.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.0%).
Prior Value
(26.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
0.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 0.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (0.4%), Rice has a value of 0.1% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(0.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Rice has a value of 0.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

County: Rice Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:
78.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 78.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 81.8%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 78.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (77.8%), Rice has a value of 78.6% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(77.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Rice has a value of 78.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Workers who Walk to Work

Current Value:
5.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 5.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 2.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 5.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (2.3%), Rice has a value of 5.9% which is higher and better.
KS Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Rice has a value of 5.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Employer Establishments

Current Value:
257
Number of Establishments
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rice (257) is greater  than the previously measured value (254).
Prior Value
(254)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
56.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 56.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 56.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (61.3%), Rice has a value of 56.8% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(61.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Rice has a value of 56.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
58.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 58.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 58.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (62.7%), Rice has a value of 58.3% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Rice has a value of 58.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

County: Rice Size of Labor Force

4,955
Persons
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rice (4,955) is less and worse than the previously measured value (5,245).
Prior Value
(5,245)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Total Employment

Current Value:

County: Rice Total Employment

2,416
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rice (2,416) is greater  than the previously measured value (2,399).
Prior Value
(2,399)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Total Employment Change

Current Value:
0.7%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 0.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -1.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -4.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 0.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -2.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -5.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (-1.5%), Rice has a value of 0.7% which is higher and better.
KS Value
(-1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (-4.3%), Rice has a value of 0.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (0.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (-3.8%).
Prior Value
(-3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
2.5%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 2.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (2.7%), Rice has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.1%), Rice has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (2.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.9%).
Prior Value
(1.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
12.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 12.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 12.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (13.4%), Rice has a value of 12.7% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Rice has a value of 12.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (12.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.1%).
Prior Value
(16.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Community Spending on Food

Current Value:
13.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (12.7%), Rice has a value of 13.3%.
KS Value
(12.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.6%), Rice has a value of 13.3%.
US Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (13.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.3%).
Prior Value
(13.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Rice Food Insecurity Rate

9.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (9.9%), Rice has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Rice has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (9.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
47.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (48.9%), Rice has a value of 47.1%.
KS Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Rice has a value of 47.1%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

81
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:
51.3%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 51.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 48.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 51.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,710 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (40.8%), Rice has a value of 51.3% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(40.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (42.8%), Rice has a value of 51.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (51.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (40.8%).
Prior Value
(40.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

Current Value:
0.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 0.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.1%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 85 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 0.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,923 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (1.8%), Rice has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.7%), Rice has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Kansas Medical Assistance Programs - Adults per 1000 Population, 20-64 Age-Group

107.9
Per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (99.4), Rice has a value of 107.9.
KS Value
(99.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (107.9) is greater  than the previously measured value (47.2).
Prior Value
(47.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Kansas Medical Assistance Programs - Children per 1000 Population, 0-19 Age-Group

517.6
Per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (465.1), Rice has a value of 517.6.
KS Value
(465.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (517.6) is greater  than the previously measured value (238.7).
Prior Value
(238.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Community Spending on Housing

Current Value:
29.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (31.1%), Rice has a value of 29.9%.
KS Value
(31.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.1%), Rice has a value of 29.9%.
US Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (29.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (29.8%).
Prior Value
(29.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Home Renter Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
16.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 16.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 16.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (16.7%), Rice has a value of 16.6% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (16.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (15.7%).
Prior Value
(15.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Homeowner Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
14.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 14.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.1%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 14.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (14.2%), Rice has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (14.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.4%).
Prior Value
(13.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

County: Rice Homeowner Vacancy Rate

3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 3.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 3.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (1.3%), Rice has a value of 3.1% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Rice has a value of 3.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Homeownership

Current Value:

County: Rice Homeownership

64.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 64.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 61.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 64.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (60.1%), Rice has a value of 64.8% which is higher and better.
KS Value
(60.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Rice has a value of 64.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Housing Units

Current Value:

County: Rice Housing Units

4,396
Housing units
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rice (4,396) is greater  than the previously measured value (4,377).
Prior Value
(4,377)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:
$711
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of $711 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $742 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $828.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value ($986), Rice has a value of $711 which is lower and better.
KS Value
($986)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Rice has a value of $711 which is lower and better.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Median Housing Unit Value

Current Value:
$87,700
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of $87,700 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $114,100 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $92,800.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value ($189,300), Rice has a value of $87,700 which is lower and worse.
KS Value
($189,300)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Rice has a value of $87,700 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

$438
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of $438 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $519 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $572.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value ($592), Rice has a value of $438 which is lower and better.
KS Value
($592)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Rice has a value of $438 which is lower and better.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

$1,168
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of $1,168 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,252 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,398.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value ($1,580), Rice has a value of $1,168 which is lower and better.
KS Value
($1,580)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Rice has a value of $1,168 which is lower and better.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

County: Rice Overcrowded Households

0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (2.0%), Rice has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Rice has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

24.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 24.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.1%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 24.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (43.7%), Rice has a value of 24.3% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Rice has a value of 24.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Rice Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:
7.5%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (12.3%), Rice has a value of 7.5% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Rice has a value of 7.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (7.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Utilities Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
7.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 7.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 7.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (6.2%), Rice has a value of 7.4% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (7.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.1%).
Prior Value
(7.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold

59.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 59.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (61.0%), Rice has a value of 59.7% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (59.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (62.0%).
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)

29.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 29.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.8%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (27.0%), Rice has a value of 29.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (29.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.9%).
Prior Value
(23.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Income Inequality

Current Value:

County: Rice Income Inequality

0.420
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 0.420 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.427 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.447.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 0.420 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.445 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.470.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (0.458), Rice has a value of 0.420 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(0.458)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.483), Rice has a value of 0.420 which is lower and better.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Median Household Income

Current Value:
$58,523
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of $58,523 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $59,417 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $54,336.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of $58,523 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value ($69,747), Rice has a value of $58,523 which is lower and worse.
KS Value
($69,747)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Rice has a value of $58,523 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Per Capita Income

Current Value:

County: Rice Per Capita Income

$32,074
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of $32,074 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,879 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $29,909.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of $32,074 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value ($38,108), Rice has a value of $32,074 which is lower and worse.
KS Value
($38,108)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Rice has a value of $32,074 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
14.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 14.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 14.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (13.9%), Rice has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Rice has a value of 14.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
6.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 6.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 103 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 6.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (7.6%), Rice has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Rice has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Households Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
11.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (12.0%), Rice has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (11.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.1%).
Prior Value
(14.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
9.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 9.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 9.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (8.2%), Rice has a value of 9.2% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Rice has a value of 9.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Current Value:
158
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:
70.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 70.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.8%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 70.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (71.7%), Rice has a value of 70.3% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Rice has a value of 70.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
9.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (11.6%), Rice has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(11.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Rice has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

County: Rice Poverty Status by School Enrollment

Current Value:
9.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 9.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 9.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (10.2%), Rice has a value of 9.1% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.4%), Rice has a value of 9.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Uninsured Adult Population Rate

Current Value:
13.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (13.4%), Rice has a value of 13.1% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Rice has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0% in 2016)
The state value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (13.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.6%).
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
18.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 18.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 18.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (16.0%), Rice has a value of 18.2% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Rice has a value of 18.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:
2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 2.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 2.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (1.7%), Rice has a value of 2.2% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Rice has a value of 2.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Child Care Centers

Current Value:

County: Rice Child Care Centers

8.7
Per 1,000 population under age 5
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 8.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.1.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (7.0), Rice has a value of 8.7 which is higher and better.
KS Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0), Rice has a value of 8.7 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (8.7) is less and worse than the previously measured value (9.5).
Prior Value
(9.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Day Care Center and Preschool Spending-to-Income Ratio

7.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 7.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 7.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (7.8%), Rice has a value of 7.6% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(7.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (7.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.3%).
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Home Child Care Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
3.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 3.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.1%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 3.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (3.1%), Rice has a value of 3.7% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (3.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.5%).
Prior Value
(3.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice College Tuition Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
12.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 12.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 12.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (12.6%), Rice has a value of 12.3% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (12.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.7%).
Prior Value
(11.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Community Spending on Education

Current Value:
1.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (2.3%), Rice has a value of 1.7%.
KS Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Rice has a value of 1.7%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (1.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.7%).
Prior Value
(1.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
23.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 22.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 20.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (34.7%), Rice has a value of 23.7% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Rice has a value of 23.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

92.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 92.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.7%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 92.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (91.8%), Rice has a value of 92.0% which is higher and better.
KS Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Rice has a value of 92.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Student Loan Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
5.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 5.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 5.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (4.6%), Rice has a value of 5.4% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (5.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.2%).
Prior Value
(5.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Vocational, Technical, and Other School Tuition Spending-to-Income Ratio

1.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 1.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 1.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (1.6%), Rice has a value of 1.9% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(1.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (1.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.8%).
Prior Value
(1.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice

Education / School Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Education / School Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Student-to-Teacher Ratio

Current Value:
10.5
Students per teacher
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 10.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.1.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 104 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 10.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (12.9), Rice has a value of 10.5 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(12.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.4), Rice has a value of 10.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (10.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.0).
Prior Value
(11.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Education / Student Performance K-12

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Education / Student Performance K-12

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice High School Graduation

Current Value:

County: Rice High School Graduation

93.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 93.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (89.1%), Rice has a value of 93.3% which is higher and better.
KS Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (93.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (88.6%).
Prior Value
(88.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (90.7%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(90.7%)

County: Rice

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Access to Exercise Opportunities

Current Value:
68.2%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 68.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 104 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 68.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (79.9%), Rice has a value of 68.2% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(79.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Rice has a value of 68.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (68.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (66.7%).
Prior Value
(66.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Rice Access to Parks

3.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 3.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 5.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (67.5%), Rice has a value of 3.6% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(67.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (3.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (0.4%).
Prior Value
(0.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Food Environment Index

Current Value:

County: Rice Food Environment Index

8.0
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 8.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.4.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 8.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (7.1), Rice has a value of 8.0 which is higher and better.
KS Value
(7.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Rice has a value of 8.0 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (8.0) is greater and better than the previously measured value (7.7).
Prior Value
(7.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Liquor Store Density

Current Value:

County: Rice Liquor Store Density

42.6
Stores per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 42.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.7.
KS Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 95 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 42.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,477 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (20.4), Rice has a value of 42.6 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(20.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.7), Rice has a value of 42.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (42.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (42.7).
Prior Value
(42.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Proximity to Highways

Current Value:

County: Rice Proximity to Highways

1.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 1.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (7.9%), Rice has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (1.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.7%).
Prior Value
(1.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Public Water Supply - Percent of Population Served Unaffected by SDWA Coliform Violations

100.0%
Percentage
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (100.0%), Rice has a value of 100.0%.
KS Value
(100.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (100.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (100.0%).
Prior Value
(100.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Public Water Supply - Percent of Population Served Unaffected by SDWA Nitrate Violations

99.9%
Percentage
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (100.0%), Rice has a value of 99.9% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(100.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (99.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (100.0%).
Prior Value
(100.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

Current Value:
4,364.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 4,364.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4,143.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4,362.5.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (4,077.0), Rice has a value of 4,364.0 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(4,077.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (4,364.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3,948.0).
Prior Value
(3,948.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Number of Extreme Heat Days

Current Value:
25
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rice (25) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8).
Prior Value
(8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Number of Extreme Heat Events

Current Value:
19
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rice (19) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2).
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Number of Extreme Precipitation Days

Current Value:
19
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rice (19) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (18).
Prior Value
(18)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse

Current Value:
4
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rice (4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2).
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Kansas Health Matters