Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • All Cities (Census Places)
  • All Counties
  • All Public Health Preparedness Regions
  • County : Allen Census Tracts
  • County : Allen Zip Codes
  • County : Anderson Census Tracts
  • County : Anderson Zip Codes
  • County : Atchison Census Tracts
  • County : Atchison Zip Codes
  • County : Barber Census Tracts
  • County : Barber Zip Codes
  • County : Barton Census Tracts
  • County : Barton Zip Codes
  • County : Bourbon Census Tracts
  • County : Bourbon Zip Codes
  • County : Brown Census Tracts
  • County : Brown Zip Codes
  • County : Butler Census Tracts
  • County : Butler Zip Codes
  • County : Chase Census Tracts
  • County : Chase Zip Codes
  • County : Chautauqua Census Tracts
  • County : Chautauqua Zip Codes
  • County : Cherokee Census Tracts
  • County : Cherokee Zip Codes
  • County : Cheyenne Census Tracts
  • County : Cheyenne Zip Codes
  • County : Clark Census Tracts
  • County : Clark Zip Codes
  • County : Clay Census Tracts
  • County : Clay Zip Codes
  • County : Cloud Census Tracts
  • County : Cloud Zip Codes
  • County : Coffey Census Tracts
  • County : Coffey Zip Codes
  • County : Comanche Census Tracts
  • County : Comanche Zip Codes
  • County : Cowley Census Tracts
  • County : Cowley Zip Codes
  • County : Crawford Census Tracts
  • County : Crawford Zip Codes
  • County : Decatur Census Tracts
  • County : Decatur Zip Codes
  • County : Dickinson Census Tracts
  • County : Dickinson Zip Codes
  • County : Doniphan Census Tracts
  • County : Doniphan Zip Codes
  • County : Douglas Census Tracts
  • County : Douglas Zip Codes
  • County : Edwards Census Tracts
  • County : Edwards Zip Codes
  • County : Elk Census Tracts
  • County : Elk Zip Codes
  • County : Ellis Census Tracts
  • County : Ellis Zip Codes
  • County : Ellsworth Census Tracts
  • County : Ellsworth Zip Codes
  • County : Finney Census Tracts
  • County : Finney Zip Codes
  • County : Ford Census Tracts
  • County : Ford Zip Codes
  • County : Franklin Census Tracts
  • County : Franklin Zip Codes
  • County : Geary Census Tracts
  • County : Geary Zip Codes
  • County : Gove Census Tracts
  • County : Gove Zip Codes
  • County : Graham Census Tracts
  • County : Graham Zip Codes
  • County : Grant Census Tracts
  • County : Grant Zip Codes
  • County : Gray Census Tracts
  • County : Gray Zip Codes
  • County : Greeley Census Tracts
  • County : Greeley Zip Codes
  • County : Greenwood Census Tracts
  • County : Greenwood Zip Codes
  • County : Hamilton Census Tracts
  • County : Hamilton Zip Codes
  • County : Harper Census Tracts
  • County : Harper Zip Codes
  • County : Harvey Census Tracts
  • County : Harvey Zip Codes
  • County : Haskell Census Tracts
  • County : Haskell Zip Codes
  • County : Hodgeman Census Tracts
  • County : Hodgeman Zip Codes
  • County : Jackson Census Tracts
  • County : Jackson Zip Codes
  • County : Jefferson Census Tracts
  • County : Jefferson Zip Codes
  • County : Jewell Census Tracts
  • County : Jewell Zip Codes
  • County : Johnson Census Tracts
  • County : Johnson Zip Codes
  • County : Kearny Census Tracts
  • County : Kearny Zip Codes
  • County : Kingman Census Tracts
  • County : Kingman Zip Codes
  • County : Kiowa Census Tracts
  • County : Kiowa Zip Codes
  • County : Labette Census Tracts
  • County : Labette Zip Codes
  • County : Lane Census Tracts
  • County : Lane Zip Codes
  • County : Leavenworth Census Tracts
  • County : Leavenworth Zip Codes
  • County : Lincoln Census Tracts
  • County : Lincoln Zip Codes
  • County : Linn Census Tracts
  • County : Linn Zip Codes
  • County : Logan Census Tracts
  • County : Logan Zip Codes
  • County : Lyon Census Tracts
  • County : Lyon Zip Codes
  • County : Marion Census Tracts
  • County : Marion Zip Codes
  • County : Marshall Census Tracts
  • County : Marshall Zip Codes
  • County : McPherson Census Tracts
  • County : McPherson Zip Codes
  • County : Meade Census Tracts
  • County : Meade Zip Codes
  • County : Miami Census Tracts
  • County : Miami Zip Codes
  • County : Mitchell Census Tracts
  • County : Mitchell Zip Codes
  • County : Montgomery Census Tracts
  • County : Montgomery Zip Codes
  • County : Morris Census Tracts
  • County : Morris Zip Codes
  • County : Morton Census Tracts
  • County : Morton Zip Codes
  • County : Nemaha Census Tracts
  • County : Nemaha Zip Codes
  • County : Neosho Census Tracts
  • County : Neosho Zip Codes
  • County : Ness Census Tracts
  • County : Ness Zip Codes
  • County : Norton Census Tracts
  • County : Norton Zip Codes
  • County : Osage Census Tracts
  • County : Osage Zip Codes
  • County : Osborne Census Tracts
  • County : Osborne Zip Codes
  • County : Ottawa Census Tracts
  • County : Ottawa Zip Codes
  • County : Pawnee Census Tracts
  • County : Pawnee Zip Codes
  • County : Phillips Census Tracts
  • County : Phillips Zip Codes
  • County : Pottawatomie Census Tracts
  • County : Pottawatomie Zip Codes
  • County : Pratt Census Tracts
  • County : Pratt Zip Codes
  • County : Rawlins Census Tracts
  • County : Rawlins Zip Codes
  • County : Reno Census Tracts
  • County : Reno Zip Codes
  • County : Republic Census Tracts
  • County : Republic Zip Codes
  • County : Rice Census Tracts
  • County : Rice Zip Codes
  • County : Riley Census Tracts
  • County : Riley Zip Codes
  • County : Rooks Census Tracts
  • County : Rooks Zip Codes
  • County : Rush Census Tracts
  • County : Rush Zip Codes
  • County : Russell Census Tracts
  • County : Russell Zip Codes
  • County : Saline Census Tracts
  • County : Saline Zip Codes
  • County : Scott Census Tracts
  • County : Scott Zip Codes
  • County : Sedgwick Census Tracts
  • County : Sedgwick Zip Codes
  • County : Seward Census Tracts
  • County : Seward Zip Codes
  • County : Shawnee Census Tracts
  • County : Shawnee Zip Codes
  • County : Sheridan Census Tracts
  • County : Sheridan Zip Codes
  • County : Sherman Census Tracts
  • County : Sherman Zip Codes
  • County : Smith Census Tracts
  • County : Smith Zip Codes
  • County : Stafford Census Tracts
  • County : Stafford Zip Codes
  • County : Stanton Census Tracts
  • County : Stanton Zip Codes
  • County : Stevens Census Tracts
  • County : Stevens Zip Codes
  • County : Sumner Census Tracts
  • County : Sumner Zip Codes
  • County : Thomas Census Tracts
  • County : Thomas Zip Codes
  • County : Trego Census Tracts
  • County : Trego Zip Codes
  • County : Wabaunsee Census Tracts
  • County : Wabaunsee Zip Codes
  • County : Wallace Census Tracts
  • County : Wallace Zip Codes
  • County : Washington Census Tracts
  • County : Washington Zip Codes
  • County : Wichita Census Tracts
  • County : Wichita Zip Codes
  • County : Wilson Census Tracts
  • County : Wilson Zip Codes
  • County : Woodson Census Tracts
  • County : Woodson Zip Codes
  • County : Wyandotte Census Tracts
  • County : Wyandotte Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

State: Kansas

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

State: Kansas

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
11.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 11.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (11.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.3%).
Prior Value
(12.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:
33.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Kansas has a value of 33.6%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
15.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Kansas has a value of 15.5%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
5.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Kansas has a value of 5.9%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
5.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Kansas has a value of 5.8%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

11.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Kansas has a value of 11.7%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-adjusted Alzheimer's Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

23.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (29.4), Kansas has a value of 23.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(29.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (23.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.9).
Prior Value
(22.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Alzheimers

11.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (11.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.3).
Prior Value
(10.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Kansas has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Kansas has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Kansas has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (15.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Kansas has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Kansas has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (17.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Kansas has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 18.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Kansas has a value of 18.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (18.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.0%).
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
24.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Kansas has a value of 24.0%.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (24.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.0%).
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Kansas has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
63.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 63.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 64.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Kansas has a value of 63.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (63.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (62.0%).
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
66.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 66.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 69.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Kansas has a value of 66.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (66.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.0%).
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 21.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Kansas has a value of 21.0%.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (21.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.0%).
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
50.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 46.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Kansas has a value of 50.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (50.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (49.0%).
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Kansas has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (11.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

State: Kansas People 65+ Living Alone

28.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 28.8% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Kansas has a value of 28.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:
137,903
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
8.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Kansas has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Current Value:
37,903
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

34.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 34.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Kansas has a value of 34.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (34.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (32.0%).
Prior Value
(32.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Kansas has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Kansas Health Matters