Search for Indicators
All Data
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value; higher than the comparison value; not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; significant change over time; no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period; lower than the previous measurement period; no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
County: Rice
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Adults who Binge Drink
County: Rice Adults who Binge Drink
17.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
35.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(40.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
16.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(20.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
7.8%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
18.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(15.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(18.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
44.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(37.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(48.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
75.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(71.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(74.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice
Health / Cancer
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Adults with Cancer
County: Rice Adults with Cancer
8.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Cancer: Medicare Population
County: Rice Cancer: Medicare Population
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
County: Rice Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
81.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Colon Cancer Screening
County: Rice Colon Cancer Screening
61.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
County: Rice Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
65.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Colorectal Cancer Rate
County: Rice Colorectal Cancer Rate
27.9
Per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(39.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(29.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Female Breast Cancer Rate
County: Rice Female Breast Cancer Rate
140.2
Per 100,000 female population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(129.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(151.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Lung & Bronchus Cancer Rate
County: Rice Lung & Bronchus Cancer Rate
27.4
Per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(36.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Male Prostate Cancer Rate
County: Rice Male Prostate Cancer Rate
97.4
Per 100,000 male population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(109.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(109.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
County: Rice Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
68.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)
County: Rice Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
County: Rice Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
47.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(38.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice
Health / Diabetes
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Adults 20+ with Diabetes
County: Rice Adults 20+ with Diabetes
8.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(9.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Diabetes Hospital Admission Rate
County: Rice Diabetes Hospital Admission Rate
16.0
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(13.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Rice Diabetes: Medicare Population
County: Rice Diabetes: Medicare Population
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice
Health / Disabilities
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
County: Rice Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
22.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(24.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Children with a Disability
County: Rice Children with a Disability
8.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: Rice Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Persons with a Disability
County: Rice Persons with a Disability
15.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Rice Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
6.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Rice Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Persons with a Vision Difficulty
County: Rice Persons with a Vision Difficulty
2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
County: Rice Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
8.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
County: Rice Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
74.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Adults without Health Insurance
County: Rice Adults without Health Insurance
11.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
16.0
Average cases per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(15.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(22.4 in 2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value.
Prior Value
(16.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Community Spending on Health Care
County: Rice Community Spending on Health Care
10.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Rice Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Rice Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio
8.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Rice Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Rice Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
53
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(140)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(64)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Persons with Health Insurance
County: Rice Persons with Health Insurance
89.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(88.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Rice Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
County: Rice Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
2,892.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(2,527.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3,531.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Rice Primary Care Provider Rate
53
Providers per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 97 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,995 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(79)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(52)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Staffed Hospital Bed Ratio
County: Rice Staffed Hospital Bed Ratio
2.7
Beds per 1,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(2.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(2.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice
Health / Health Information Technology
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Households with an Internet Subscription
County: Rice Households with an Internet Subscription
82.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
89.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Persons with an Internet Subscription
County: Rice Persons with an Internet Subscription
87.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(91.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Value
Compared to:
13.7
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(11.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(11.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Rice Adults who Experienced a Stroke
County: Rice Adults who Experienced a Stroke
3.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
County: Rice Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
7.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
80.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Rice Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
81.3
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2018)
Compared to:
KS Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 104 Kansas counties.
KS Value
(47.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(77.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
27.9
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2015)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
KS Value
(25.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(24.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Rice Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
County: Rice Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Cholesterol Test History
County: Rice Cholesterol Test History
80.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Congestive Heart Failure Hospital Admission Rate
County: Rice Congestive Heart Failure Hospital Admission Rate
15.9
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(24.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(18.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Rice Heart Disease Hospital Admission Rate
County: Rice Heart Disease Hospital Admission Rate
101.8
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(111.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(107.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Rice Heart Failure: Medicare Population
County: Rice Heart Failure: Medicare Population
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice High Blood Pressure Prevalence
County: Rice High Blood Pressure Prevalence
35.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)
County: Rice High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
County: Rice High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
39.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
County: Rice Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
51.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(51.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Hypertension: Medicare Population
County: Rice Hypertension: Medicare Population
65.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(65.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
County: Rice Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Percent of Adults with Diagnosed Hypertension
County: Rice Percent of Adults with Diagnosed Hypertension
34.6%
(2015)
Compared to:
KS Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(27.7%)
County: Rice Stroke: Medicare Population
County: Rice Stroke: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
County: Rice COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
0.0
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
(Sep 30, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 97 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(0.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
County: Rice COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
1.54
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.10)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.24)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Rice Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Percent of Infants Fully Immunized at 24 Months
County: Rice Percent of Infants Fully Immunized at 24 Months
67.2%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(80.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
County: Rice Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
45.6%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(45.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Rice Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
2.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Infant Mortality Rate
County: Rice Infant Mortality Rate
5.8
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.0 in 2011-2015)
The five-year U.S. rate is compared to the five-year Kansas rate. The U.S. rate may be based on one or more years of preliminary statistics. Five-year time period for this value is 2010-2014, final 2015 data not available at national level, at this time.
Prior Value
(10.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
County: Rice Number of Births per 1,000 Population
County: Rice Number of Births per 1,000 Population
10.7
Births per 1,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.8 in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(11.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Percent of all Births Occurring to Teens (15-19)
County: Rice Percent of all Births Occurring to Teens (15-19)
4.0%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(18.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(4.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Percent of Births Occurring to Unmarried Women
County: Rice Percent of Births Occurring to Unmarried Women
34.8%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(39.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(34.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
10.3%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.9% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
84.9%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(81.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(77.3% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(87.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(80.5%)
County: Rice Percent of Births with Inadequate Birth Spacing
County: Rice Percent of Births with Inadequate Birth Spacing
12.2%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Percent of Births with Low Birth Weight
County: Rice Percent of Births with Low Birth Weight
5.0%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(8.3% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(5.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Percent of WIC Mothers Breastfeeding Exclusively
County: Rice Percent of WIC Mothers Breastfeeding Exclusively
18.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(11.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Percentage of Premature Births
County: Rice Percentage of Premature Births
8.9%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(9.9% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
County: Rice
Health / Medications & Prescriptions
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Poisoning (Drugs) Hospital Admission Rate
County: Rice Poisoning (Drugs) Hospital Admission Rate
0.0
Per 10,000 population
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(1.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
County: Rice
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
County: Rice Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
20.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Depression: Medicare Population
County: Rice Depression: Medicare Population
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Mental Behavior Hospital Admissions Rate
County: Rice Mental Behavior Hospital Admissions Rate
27.2
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(70.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(31.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Rice Mental Health Provider Rate
County: Rice Mental Health Provider Rate
53
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,941 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(224)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(53)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
County: Rice Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
15.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice
Health / Mortality Data
Value
Compared to:
57.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(23.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(29.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(48.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
178.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(151.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(158.5 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(151.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
37.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(35.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(37.6 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(47.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
64.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(47.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(40.9 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(74.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
23.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(25.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(21.3 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(20.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
167.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(162.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(165.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(189.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(5.7 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
County: Rice Age-adjusted Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
County: Rice Age-adjusted Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
867.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(795.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(731.9 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(891.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
23.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(14.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(13.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(36.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
42.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(14.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(59.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
19.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(13.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(34.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)
52.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(48.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(43.2 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(33.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
KS Value
(9.1)
The County / Region values are compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(15.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cancer
County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cancer
1,560.8
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(1,176.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(849.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(149.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(108.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
344.7
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(199.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(258.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Diabetes
County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Diabetes
186.9
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(201.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(175.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
673.5
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(899.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(917.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Homicide
County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Homicide
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(264.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(79.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(67.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Suicide
County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Suicide
1,301.8
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(673.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(1,611.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(460.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(1,518.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
796.1
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(1,198.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(1,848.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Life Expectancy
County: Rice Life Expectancy
77.4
Years
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,072 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(77.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(78.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(77.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
Value
Compared to:
48.1%
(2015)
Compared to:
KS Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(40.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
42.1%
(2015)
Compared to:
KS Value
(22.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(22.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice
Health / Older Adults
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Rice Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
12.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
32.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
37.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: Rice Adults 65+ with a Disability
34.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Rice Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
19.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Rice Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
5.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Rice Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Rice Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
9.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Rice Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice
Health / Oral Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
County: Rice Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
10.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Adults who Visited a Dentist
County: Rice Adults who Visited a Dentist
65.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Dentist Rate
County: Rice Dentist Rate
32
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 101 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,056 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(62)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(32)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
56.3%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(37.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(53.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
18.8%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(19.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice
Health / Other Conditions
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Adults with Arthritis
County: Rice Adults with Arthritis
28.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Adults with Kidney Disease
County: Rice Adults with Kidney Disease
3.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Rice Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Rice Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
17.5%
(2015)
Compared to:
KS Value
(19.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
29.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice
Health / Physical Activity
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
County: Rice Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
22.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(23.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice
Health / Prevention & Safety
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Injury Hospital Admission Rate
County: Rice Injury Hospital Admission Rate
66.5
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(72.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(66.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Rice
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Adults with COPD
County: Rice Adults with COPD
7.3%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Adults with Current Asthma
County: Rice Adults with Current Asthma
9.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Asthma: Medicare Population
County: Rice Asthma: Medicare Population
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
15.4
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(21.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Rice COPD: Medicare Population
County: Rice COPD: Medicare Population
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice Pneumonia (Bacterial) Hospital Admission Rate
County: Rice Pneumonia (Bacterial) Hospital Admission Rate
39.1
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(20.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(41.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Rice
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Sexually Transmitted Disease Rate
County: Rice Sexually Transmitted Disease Rate
1.9
Cases per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(6.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(4.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice
Health / Tobacco Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Adults who Smoke
County: Rice Adults who Smoke
16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Rice Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Rice Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
2.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(2.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Rice
Health / Weight Status
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
County: Rice Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
33.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(33.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
County: Rice Percent of Adults who are Overweight
County: Rice Percent of Adults who are Overweight
40.3%
(2015)
Compared to:
KS Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(35.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Insufficient Sleep
County: Rice Insufficient Sleep
33.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(34.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)
66.8%
(2015)
Compared to:
KS Value
(83.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
20.1%
(2015)
Compared to:
KS Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days
County: Rice Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days
11.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
15.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Rice
Community
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Child Opportunity Index
County: Rice
Community / Civic Engagement
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Voter Turnout: Presidential Election
County: Rice Voter Turnout: Presidential Election
63.4%
(2016)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
KS Value
(67.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(48.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(58.4%)
<div>SDOH-07: Increase the proportion of the voting-age citizens who vote</div>
County: Rice
Community / Crime & Crime Prevention
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Rate of Violent Crime per 1,000 Population
County: Rice Rate of Violent Crime per 1,000 Population
2.0
Crimes per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(4.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(3.6 in 2014)
The Kansas State value is compared to the US value. Under reporting of crime by some public safety jurisdictions may result in lower rates.
Prior Value
(2.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Rice
Community / Demographics
Value
Compared to:
County: Rice Average Household Size
County: Rice Average Household Size
2.30
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(2.50)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.