Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Rice

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Adults who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Rice Adults who Binge Drink

17.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 17.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 17.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Rice has a value of 17.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Percent Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Having Daily Opioid Dosage >= 50 MME

35.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (33.3%), Rice has a value of 35.4% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (35.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (40.0%).
Prior Value
(40.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Percent Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Having Daily Opioid Dosage >= 90 MME

16.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (16.6%), Rice has a value of 16.4% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (16.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.2%).
Prior Value
(20.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Percent Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Receiving Both Long & Short Acting Opioids

7.8%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (7.6%), Rice has a value of 7.8% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (7.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.3%).
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Percent Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Receiving Opioid & Benzodiazepine Prescriptions

18.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (15.1%), Rice has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(15.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (18.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.8%).
Prior Value
(18.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Percent of Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Receiving Opioids Supply Greater Than 10-Days

44.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (37.8%), Rice has a value of 44.9% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(37.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (44.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (48.6%).
Prior Value
(48.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Percent of Medicare Part D Claims With Opioid Prescriptions Written For More Than 10-Day Supply

75.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (71.0%), Rice has a value of 75.3% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(71.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (75.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (74.0%).
Prior Value
(74.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

County: Rice Adults with Cancer

8.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 8.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Rice has a value of 8.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (11.0%), Rice has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Rice has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:
81.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 81.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.6%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 81.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Rice has a value of 81.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Colon Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Rice Colon Cancer Screening

61.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 61.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 61.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.8%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 61.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Rice has a value of 61.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
65.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 65.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.6%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 65.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Rice has a value of 65.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Colorectal Cancer Rate

Current Value:

County: Rice Colorectal Cancer Rate

27.9
Per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (39.2), Rice has a value of 27.9 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(39.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (27.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.2).
Prior Value
(29.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Female Breast Cancer Rate

Current Value:
140.2
Per 100,000 female population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (129.0), Rice has a value of 140.2 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(129.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (140.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (151.1).
Prior Value
(151.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Lung & Bronchus Cancer Rate

Current Value:
27.4
Per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (54.0), Rice has a value of 27.4 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (27.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (36.8).
Prior Value
(36.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Male Prostate Cancer Rate

Current Value:
97.4
Per 100,000 male population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (109.8), Rice has a value of 97.4 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(109.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (97.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (109.7).
Prior Value
(109.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:
68.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 68.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 68.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Rice has a value of 68.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

County: Rice Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
47.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 47.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 48.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 41.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 47.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (50.0%), Rice has a value of 47.0% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Rice has a value of 47.0%.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (47.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (38.0%).
Prior Value
(38.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Current Value:
8.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 8.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 8.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (8.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.7%).
Prior Value
(9.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Diabetes Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
16.0
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (16.5), Rice has a value of 16.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (16.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0).
Prior Value
(13.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 22.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 22.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (24.0%), Rice has a value of 22.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Rice has a value of 22.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (22.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.0%).
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
22.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 22.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 22.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (24.6%), Rice has a value of 22.6% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(24.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Rice has a value of 22.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Children with a Disability

Current Value:
8.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (4.8%), Rice has a value of 8.8%.
KS Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Rice has a value of 8.8%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (5.6%), Rice has a value of 5.5%.
KS Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Rice has a value of 5.5%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Persons with a Disability

Current Value:
15.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (13.4%), Rice has a value of 15.3%.
KS Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Rice has a value of 15.3%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
6.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (4.2%), Rice has a value of 6.5%.
KS Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Rice has a value of 6.5%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (2.2%), Rice has a value of 2.7%.
KS Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Rice has a value of 2.7%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (2.4%), Rice has a value of 2.0%.
KS Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Rice has a value of 2.0%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
8.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (6.5%), Rice has a value of 8.7%.
KS Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Rice has a value of 8.7%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
74.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 74.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.8%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 74.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (73.6%), Rice has a value of 74.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:
11.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Rice has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Average Monthly WIC Participation per 1,000 population

16.0
Average cases per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (15.0), Rice has a value of 16.0.
KS Value
(15.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.4), Rice has a value of 16.0.
US Value
(22.4 in 2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (16.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0).
Prior Value
(16.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Community Spending on Health Care

Current Value:
10.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (8.6%), Rice has a value of 10.0%.
KS Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Rice has a value of 10.0%.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (10.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (10.1%).
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
8.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 8.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 8.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (6.8%), Rice has a value of 8.2% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (8.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.9%).
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
53
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 53 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 117 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 53 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (140), Rice has a value of 53 which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(140)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (53) is less and worse than the previously measured value (64).
Prior Value
(64)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
89.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 89.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 89.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (89.1%), Rice has a value of 89.4% which is higher and better.
KS Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (89.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (88.8%).
Prior Value
(88.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Rice Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

2,892.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 2,892.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,745.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,428.0.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 2,892.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (2,527.0), Rice has a value of 2,892.0 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(2,527.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Rice has a value of 2,892.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (2,892.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (3,531.0).
Prior Value
(3,531.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
53
Providers per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 53 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 97 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 53 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 30.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,995 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (79), Rice has a value of 53 which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(79)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (53) is greater and better than the previously measured value (52).
Prior Value
(52)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Staffed Hospital Bed Ratio

Current Value:
2.7
Beds per 1,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (2.9), Rice has a value of 2.7.
KS Value
(2.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (2.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.7).
Prior Value
(2.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
82.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 82.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 82.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (88.2%), Rice has a value of 82.7% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Rice has a value of 82.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

89.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 89.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 89.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (94.2%), Rice has a value of 89.7% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Rice has a value of 89.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
87.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 87.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 87.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (91.1%), Rice has a value of 87.3% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(91.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Rice has a value of 87.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Acute Cerebrovascular (Stroke) Disease Hospital Admission Rate

13.7
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (11.6), Rice has a value of 13.7 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(11.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (13.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.9).
Prior Value
(11.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:
3.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 3.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 3.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Rice has a value of 3.3%.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
7.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), Rice has a value of 7.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

80.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 80.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 80.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Rice has a value of 80.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
81.3
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 81.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 61.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 75.6.
KS Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 104 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (47.9), Rice has a value of 81.3 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(47.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (81.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (77.6).
Prior Value
(77.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack

27.9
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 27.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (25.6), Rice has a value of 27.9 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(25.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (27.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (24.1).
Prior Value
(24.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (15.0%), Rice has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Rice has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:
80.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 80.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.1%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 80.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Rice has a value of 80.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Congestive Heart Failure Hospital Admission Rate

15.9
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (24.1), Rice has a value of 15.9 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(24.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (15.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.3).
Prior Value
(18.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Heart Disease Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
101.8
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (111.9), Rice has a value of 101.8 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(111.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (101.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (107.4).
Prior Value
(107.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (11.0%), Rice has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Rice has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:
35.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 35.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 35.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Rice has a value of 35.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

County: Rice High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:
39.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 39.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 39.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Rice has a value of 39.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
51.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 51.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 51.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (63.0%), Rice has a value of 51.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Rice has a value of 51.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (51.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (51.0%).
Prior Value
(51.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
65.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 65.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 69.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 65.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (66.0%), Rice has a value of 65.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Rice has a value of 65.0%.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (65.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (65.0%).
Prior Value
(65.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 21.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 21.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (21.0%), Rice has a value of 21.0%.
KS Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Rice has a value of 21.0%.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (21.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Percent of Adults with Diagnosed Hypertension

Current Value:
34.6%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (31.6%), Rice has a value of 34.6% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.0%), Rice has a value of 34.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.7%)

County: Rice Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 5.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (5.0%), Rice has a value of 5.0%.
KS Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Rice has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (5.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Current Value:
0.0
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.3.
KS Counties
(Sep 30, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 97 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (0.5), Rice has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(0.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7), Rice has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Current Value:
1.54
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 1.54 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.73 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.11.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 1.54 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.84 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.01.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (11.10), Rice has a value of 1.54 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(11.10)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), Rice has a value of 1.54 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (1.54) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.24).
Prior Value
(9.24)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 18.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 39.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 18.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (50.0%), Rice has a value of 18.0% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Rice has a value of 18.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (18.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.0%).
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Percent of Infants Fully Immunized at 24 Months

67.2%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (71.1%), Rice has a value of 67.2% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (67.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (80.1%).
Prior Value
(80.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19

Current Value:
45.6%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 45.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 45.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 45.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (45.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (45.6%).
Prior Value
(45.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
2.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 2.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 4.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 2.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (7.0%), Rice has a value of 2.0% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Rice has a value of 2.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (2.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (1.0%).
Prior Value
(1.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Rice Infant Mortality Rate

5.8
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (5.9), Rice has a value of 5.8 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0), Rice has a value of 5.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0 in 2011-2015)
The five-year U.S. rate is compared to the five-year Kansas rate. The U.S. rate may be based on one or more years of preliminary statistics. Five-year time period for this value is 2010-2014, final 2015 data not available at national level, at this time.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (5.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.3).
Prior Value
(10.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)

County: Rice Number of Births per 1,000 Population

Current Value:
10.7
Births per 1,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (11.9), Rice has a value of 10.7.
KS Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.8), Rice has a value of 10.7.
US Value
(11.8 in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (10.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0).
Prior Value
(11.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Percent of all Births Occurring to Teens (15-19)

4.0%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (5.0%), Rice has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.8%), Rice has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (4.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.2%).
Prior Value
(4.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Percent of Births Occurring to Unmarried Women

34.8%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (36.4%), Rice has a value of 34.8% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (39.8%), Rice has a value of 34.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(39.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (34.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.5%).
Prior Value
(34.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Percent of births Where Mother Smoked During Pregnancy

10.3%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (7.9%), Rice has a value of 10.3% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.9%), Rice has a value of 10.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.9% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (10.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Percent of Births Where Prenatal Care began in First Trimester

84.9%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (81.3%), Rice has a value of 84.9% which is higher and better.
KS Value
(81.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.3%), Rice has a value of 84.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(77.3% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (84.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (87.0%).
Prior Value
(87.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.5%)

County: Rice Percent of Births with Inadequate Birth Spacing

12.2%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (10.2%), Rice has a value of 12.2% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.8%), Rice has a value of 12.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (12.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Percent of Births with Low Birth Weight

Current Value:
5.0%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (7.4%), Rice has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Rice has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.3% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.4%).
Prior Value
(5.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Percent of WIC Mothers Breastfeeding Exclusively

18.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (16.3%), Rice has a value of 18.5% which is higher and better.
KS Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (18.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (11.4%).
Prior Value
(11.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Percentage of Premature Births

Current Value:
8.9%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (10.0%), Rice has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.9%), Rice has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.9% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (8.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)

County: Rice

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Poisoning (Drugs) Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
0.0
Per 10,000 population
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (1.1), Rice has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(1.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.

County: Rice

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
20.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 20.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 20.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Rice has a value of 20.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (18.0%), Rice has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Rice has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (17.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Mental Behavior Hospital Admissions Rate

Current Value:
27.2
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (70.6), Rice has a value of 27.2 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(70.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (27.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (31.1).
Prior Value
(31.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:
53
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 53 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 53 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 131 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,941 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (224), Rice has a value of 53 which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(224)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (53) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (53).
Prior Value
(53)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
15.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 15.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Rice has a value of 15.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Age-adjusted Alzheimer's Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

57.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (23.3), Rice has a value of 57.2 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(23.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (29.4), Rice has a value of 57.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(29.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (57.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (48.3).
Prior Value
(48.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Age-adjusted Cancer Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

178.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (151.4), Rice has a value of 178.7 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(151.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (158.5), Rice has a value of 178.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(158.5 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (178.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (151.4).
Prior Value
(151.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)

County: Rice Age-adjusted Cerebrovascular Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

37.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (35.2), Rice has a value of 37.3 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(35.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (37.6), Rice has a value of 37.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.6 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (37.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.5).
Prior Value
(47.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

County: Rice Age-adjusted Chronic Lower Respiratory Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

64.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (47.1), Rice has a value of 64.3 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(47.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (40.9), Rice has a value of 64.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(40.9 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (64.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (74.7).
Prior Value
(74.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Age-adjusted Diabetes Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

23.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (25.0), Rice has a value of 23.2 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(25.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.3), Rice has a value of 23.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.3 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (23.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.3).
Prior Value
(20.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Age-adjusted Heart Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

167.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (162.0), Rice has a value of 167.7 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(162.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (165.0), Rice has a value of 167.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(165.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (167.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (189.7).
Prior Value
(189.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Age-adjusted Homicide Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (5.9), Rice has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.7), Rice has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.7 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)

County: Rice Age-adjusted Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

867.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (795.9), Rice has a value of 867.3 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(795.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (731.9), Rice has a value of 867.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(731.9 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (867.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (891.1).
Prior Value
(891.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Age-adjusted Nephritis, Nephrotic Syndrome, Nephrosis Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

23.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (14.8), Rice has a value of 23.3 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(14.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.0), Rice has a value of 23.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (23.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.3).
Prior Value
(36.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Age-adjusted Suicide Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

42.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (18.5), Rice has a value of 42.4 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0), Rice has a value of 42.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (42.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (59.3).
Prior Value
(59.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)

County: Rice Age-adjusted Traffic Injury Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

19.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (13.6), Rice has a value of 19.1 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(13.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.4), Rice has a value of 19.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (19.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.5).
Prior Value
(34.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)

County: Rice Age-adjusted Unintentional Injuries Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

52.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (48.7), Rice has a value of 52.8 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(48.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (43.2), Rice has a value of 52.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(43.2 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (52.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (33.1).
Prior Value
(33.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Alzheimers

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (9.1), Rice has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(9.1)
The County / Region values are compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.3).
Prior Value
(15.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cancer

1,560.8
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (1,176.7), Rice has a value of 1,560.8 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(1,176.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (1,560.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (849.6).
Prior Value
(849.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cerebrovascular Disease

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (149.9), Rice has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(149.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (108.5).
Prior Value
(108.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Chronic Lower Respiratory Disease

344.7
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (199.2), Rice has a value of 344.7 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(199.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (344.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (258.2).
Prior Value
(258.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Diabetes

186.9
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (201.3), Rice has a value of 186.9 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(201.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (186.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (175.5).
Prior Value
(175.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Heart Disease

673.5
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (899.4), Rice has a value of 673.5 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(899.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (673.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (917.3).
Prior Value
(917.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Homicide

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (264.9), Rice has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(264.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Nephritis, Nephrotic Syndrome Nephrosis

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (79.2), Rice has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(79.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (67.6).
Prior Value
(67.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Suicide

1,301.8
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (673.8), Rice has a value of 1,301.8 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(673.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (1,301.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1,611.5).
Prior Value
(1,611.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Traffic Injury

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (460.5), Rice has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(460.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (1,518.7).
Prior Value
(1,518.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Unintentional Injuries

796.1
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (1,198.7), Rice has a value of 796.1 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(1,198.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (796.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1,848.4).
Prior Value
(1,848.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Rice Life Expectancy

77.4
Years
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 77.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 77.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.6.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 77.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,072 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (77.8), Rice has a value of 77.4 which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(77.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (78.5), Rice has a value of 77.4 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (77.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (77.5).
Prior Value
(77.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Percent of Adults Who Reported Consuming Fruit Less than 1 Time Per Day

48.1%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (43.7%), Rice has a value of 48.1% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (40.1%), Rice has a value of 48.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(40.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Percent of Adults Who Reported Consuming Vegetables Less than 1 Time Per Day

42.1%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (22.3%), Rice has a value of 42.1% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(22.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.3%), Rice has a value of 42.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(22.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
12.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 12.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 12.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (11.9%), Rice has a value of 12.5% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (12.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.9%).
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

32.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 32.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 34.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 32.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Rice has a value of 32.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

37.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.1%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Rice has a value of 37.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:
34.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (33.6%), Rice has a value of 34.6%.
KS Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Rice has a value of 34.6%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
19.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (15.5%), Rice has a value of 19.6%.
KS Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Rice has a value of 19.6%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
5.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (5.9%), Rice has a value of 5.9%.
KS Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Rice has a value of 5.9%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (5.8%), Rice has a value of 2.2%.
KS Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Rice has a value of 2.2%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

9.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (11.7%), Rice has a value of 9.5%.
KS Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Rice has a value of 9.5%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (6.0%), Rice has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Rice has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
10.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 10.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.7%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 10.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.4%), Rice has a value of 10.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:
65.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 65.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 65.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (64.8%), Rice has a value of 65.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Dentist Rate

Current Value:

County: Rice Dentist Rate

32
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 32 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 40 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 25.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 101 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 32 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,056 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (62), Rice has a value of 32 which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(62)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (32) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32).
Prior Value
(32)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Percentage of Screened 3-12 Grade Students w No Dental Sealants

56.3%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (37.3%), Rice has a value of 56.3% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(37.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (56.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (53.1%).
Prior Value
(53.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Percentage of Screened K-12 Grade Students w Obvious Dental Decay

18.8%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (16.6%), Rice has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (18.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.6%).
Prior Value
(19.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

County: Rice Adults with Arthritis

28.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 28.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.6%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 28.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (25.2%), Rice has a value of 28.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:
3.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 3.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.7%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 3.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Rice has a value of 3.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (17.0%), Rice has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Rice has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (15.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (11.0%), Rice has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Rice has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Percent of Adults Who Were Ever Diagnosed with a Depressive Disorder

17.5%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (19.4%), Rice has a value of 17.5% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(19.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.6%), Rice has a value of 17.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

29.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 29.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 29.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (34.0%), Rice has a value of 29.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Rice has a value of 29.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (29.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.0%).
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

Current Value:
22.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 22.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 22.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (22.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.1%).
Prior Value
(23.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Injury Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
66.5
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (72.0), Rice has a value of 66.5 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(72.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (66.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.1).
Prior Value
(66.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Adults with COPD

Current Value:

County: Rice Adults with COPD

7.3%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 7.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 7.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Rice has a value of 7.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:
9.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Rice has a value of 9.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (6.0%), Rice has a value of 6.0%.
KS Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Rice has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (6.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Hospital Admission Rate

15.4
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (9.8), Rice has a value of 15.4 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (15.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.0).
Prior Value
(21.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 13.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 13.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (12.0%), Rice has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Rice has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice Pneumonia (Bacterial) Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
39.1
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (20.2), Rice has a value of 39.1 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(20.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (39.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (41.8).
Prior Value
(41.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Sexually Transmitted Disease Rate

Current Value:
1.9
Cases per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (6.7), Rice has a value of 1.9 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(6.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (1.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.7).
Prior Value
(4.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

County: Rice Adults who Smoke

16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Rice has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Rice Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
2.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 2.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.8%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 2.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (2.2%), Rice has a value of 2.7% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (2.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.6%).
Prior Value
(2.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rice

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

Current Value:
33.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 33.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 33.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (33.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (33.3%).
Prior Value
(33.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)

County: Rice Percent of Adults who are Overweight

Current Value:
40.3%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (33.8%), Rice has a value of 40.3% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.7%), Rice has a value of 40.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

County: Rice Insufficient Sleep

33.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 33.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 33.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (33.0%), Rice has a value of 33.9% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Rice has a value of 33.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (33.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (34.9%).
Prior Value
(34.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

County: Rice Percent of Adults Who Reported That They Always Wear a Seatbelt When They Drive or Ride in a Car

66.8%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (83.0%), Rice has a value of 66.8% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(83.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.2%), Rice has a value of 66.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Percent of Adults with Fair or Poor Self-Perceived Health Status

20.1%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (15.7%), Rice has a value of 20.1% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.7%), Rice has a value of 20.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
11.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Rice has a value of 11.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

15.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 15.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rice has a value of 15.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Rice has a value of 15.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rice

Community

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Community

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Child Opportunity Index

Current Value:
49.6
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (45.32), Rice has a value of 49.6 which is higher and better.
KS Value
(45.32)

County: Rice

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Voter Turnout: Presidential Election

Current Value:
63.4%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Rice has a value of 63.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (67.4%), Rice has a value of 63.4% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(67.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (63.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (48.8%).
Prior Value
(48.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (58.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(58.4%)
<div>SDOH-07: Increase the proportion of the voting-age citizens who vote</div>

County: Rice

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Rate of Violent Crime per 1,000 Population

Current Value:
2.0
Crimes per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (4.4), Rice has a value of 2.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(4.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6), Rice has a value of 2.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.6 in 2014)
The Kansas State value is compared to the US value. Under reporting of crime by some public safety jurisdictions may result in lower rates.
Compared to the prior value, Rice (2.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.4).
Prior Value
(2.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rice value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rice

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Rice Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Rice Average Household Size

2.30
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (2.50), Rice has a value of 2.30.
KS Value
(2.50)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Rice has a value of 2.30.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Kansas Health Matters