Search for Indicators
All Data
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.
County: Dickinson
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Adults who Binge Drink
County: Dickinson Adults who Binge Drink
17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
County: Dickinson Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
9.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2006-2012)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,098 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(9.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
34.5%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(32.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
16.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(15.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
9.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(8.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
14.5%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(15.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(15.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
38.1%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(37.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(42.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
71.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(71.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(69.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson
Health / Cancer
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Adults with Cancer
County: Dickinson Adults with Cancer
8.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Cancer: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Cancer: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
County: Dickinson Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
82.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Colon Cancer Screening
County: Dickinson Colon Cancer Screening
60.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
County: Dickinson Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
68.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Colorectal Cancer Rate
County: Dickinson Colorectal Cancer Rate
45.9
Per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(39.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(44.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Female Breast Cancer Rate
County: Dickinson Female Breast Cancer Rate
94.8
Per 100,000 female population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(129.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(99.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Lung & Bronchus Cancer Rate
County: Dickinson Lung & Bronchus Cancer Rate
46.9
Per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(48.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Male Prostate Cancer Rate
County: Dickinson Male Prostate Cancer Rate
112.2
Per 100,000 male population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(109.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(126.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
County: Dickinson Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
70.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)
County: Dickinson Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
49.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(48.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson
Health / Diabetes
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Adults 20+ with Diabetes
County: Dickinson Adults 20+ with Diabetes
8.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Diabetes Hospital Admission Rate
County: Dickinson Diabetes Hospital Admission Rate
12.4
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(14.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson Diabetes: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Diabetes: Medicare Population
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson
Health / Disabilities
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
County: Dickinson Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
18.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(24.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Children with a Disability
County: Dickinson Children with a Disability
5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: Dickinson Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Persons with a Disability
County: Dickinson Persons with a Disability
16.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Dickinson Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Dickinson Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Persons with a Vision Difficulty
County: Dickinson Persons with a Vision Difficulty
2.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
County: Dickinson Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
7.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
County: Dickinson Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
74.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Adults without Health Insurance
County: Dickinson Adults without Health Insurance
9.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Average Monthly WIC Participation per 1,000 population
County: Dickinson Average Monthly WIC Participation per 1,000 population
18.2
Average cases per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(16.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(22.4 in 2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value.
Prior Value
(15.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Community Spending on Health Care
County: Dickinson Community Spending on Health Care
10.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Dickinson Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio
7.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(8.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Dickinson Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
81
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(149)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(98)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Persons with Health Insurance
County: Dickinson Persons with Health Insurance
88.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(88.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Dickinson Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
3,054.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(2,527.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3,484.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Dickinson Primary Care Provider Rate
49
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(78)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(44)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Staffed Hospital Bed Ratio
County: Dickinson Staffed Hospital Bed Ratio
1.9
Beds per 1,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(2.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(1.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson
Health / Health Information Technology
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Households with an Internet Subscription
County: Dickinson Households with an Internet Subscription
84.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
County: Dickinson Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
92.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Persons with an Internet Subscription
County: Dickinson Persons with an Internet Subscription
89.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(91.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Acute Cerebrovascular (Stroke) Disease Hospital Admission Rate
County: Dickinson Acute Cerebrovascular (Stroke) Disease Hospital Admission Rate
13.6
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(11.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(14.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson Adults who Experienced a Stroke
County: Dickinson Adults who Experienced a Stroke
3.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
County: Dickinson Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
7.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
County: Dickinson Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
82.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
41.5
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 104 Kansas counties.
KS Value
(47.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(55.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
24.2
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2015)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
KS Value
(25.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(26.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Cholesterol Test History
County: Dickinson Cholesterol Test History
84.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Congestive Heart Failure Hospital Admission Rate
County: Dickinson Congestive Heart Failure Hospital Admission Rate
19.7
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(24.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(23.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson Heart Disease Hospital Admission Rate
County: Dickinson Heart Disease Hospital Admission Rate
109.0
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(111.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(122.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson Heart Failure: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Heart Failure: Medicare Population
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson High Blood Pressure Prevalence
County: Dickinson High Blood Pressure Prevalence
35.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)
County: Dickinson High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
County: Dickinson High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
36.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
52.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(51.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Hypertension: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Hypertension: Medicare Population
64.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(63.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Percent of Adults with Diagnosed Hypertension
County: Dickinson Percent of Adults with Diagnosed Hypertension
31.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(32.3% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(37.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(27.7%)
County: Dickinson Stroke: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Stroke: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
County: Dickinson COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
0.0
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
(Sep 30, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 97 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(0.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
County: Dickinson COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
3.91
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.10)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3.91)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
36.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(33.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Percent of Infants Fully Immunized at 24 Months
County: Dickinson Percent of Infants Fully Immunized at 24 Months
82.3%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(65.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
County: Dickinson Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
60.7%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(60.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Infant Mortality Rate
County: Dickinson Infant Mortality Rate
9.0
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(6.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(5.9 in 2012-2016)
The regional value is compared to the most current national value.
Prior Value
(8.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
County: Dickinson Number of Births per 1,000 Population
County: Dickinson Number of Births per 1,000 Population
10.3
Births per 1,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(12.5 in 2013-2015)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. Three-year time period for this comparison is 2013-2015, this is the most current US data at this time.
Prior Value
(10.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Percent of all Births Occurring to Teens (15-19)
County: Dickinson Percent of all Births Occurring to Teens (15-19)
4.8%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(18.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(4.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Percent of Births Occurring to Unmarried Women
County: Dickinson Percent of Births Occurring to Unmarried Women
31.5%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(39.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(33.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Percent of births Where Mother Smoked During Pregnancy
County: Dickinson Percent of births Where Mother Smoked During Pregnancy
14.4%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.9% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(16.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Percent of Births Where Prenatal Care began in First Trimester
County: Dickinson Percent of Births Where Prenatal Care began in First Trimester
86.7%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(81.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(77.3% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(85.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(80.5%)
County: Dickinson Percent of Births with Inadequate Birth Spacing
County: Dickinson Percent of Births with Inadequate Birth Spacing
9.6%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Percent of Births with Low Birth Weight
County: Dickinson Percent of Births with Low Birth Weight
6.9%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(8.3% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Percent of WIC Mothers Breastfeeding Exclusively
County: Dickinson Percent of WIC Mothers Breastfeeding Exclusively
28.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(24.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Percentage of Premature Births
County: Dickinson Percentage of Premature Births
8.8%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(9.9% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(9.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
County: Dickinson
Health / Medications & Prescriptions
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Poisoning (Drugs) Hospital Admission Rate
County: Dickinson Poisoning (Drugs) Hospital Admission Rate
1.1
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(3.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(1.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
County: Dickinson Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
19.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Depression: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Depression: Medicare Population
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Frequent Mental Distress
County: Dickinson Frequent Mental Distress
15.1%
(2019)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson Mental Behavior Hospital Admissions Rate
County: Dickinson Mental Behavior Hospital Admissions Rate
72.8
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(70.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(71.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson Mental Health Provider Rate
County: Dickinson Mental Health Provider Rate
60
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 84 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(238)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(60)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
County: Dickinson Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
14.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson
Health / Mortality Data
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Age-adjusted Alzheimer's Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
County: Dickinson Age-adjusted Alzheimer's Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
16.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(23.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(31.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(16.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Age-adjusted Cancer Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
County: Dickinson Age-adjusted Cancer Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
166.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(149.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(158.5 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(157.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
45.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(35.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(37.6 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(38.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
51.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(44.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(41.6 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(58.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Age-adjusted Diabetes Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
County: Dickinson Age-adjusted Diabetes Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
32.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(26.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(21.5 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(29.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Age-adjusted Heart Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
County: Dickinson Age-adjusted Heart Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
153.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(167.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(168.5 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(159.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Age-adjusted Homicide Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
County: Dickinson Age-adjusted Homicide Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
2.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(5.7 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
County: Dickinson Age-adjusted Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
County: Dickinson Age-adjusted Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
908.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(843.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(731.9 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(798.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
12.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(14.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(13.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(9.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Age-adjusted Suicide Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
County: Dickinson Age-adjusted Suicide Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
30.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(13.3 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(17.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
County: Dickinson Age-adjusted Traffic Injury Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
County: Dickinson Age-adjusted Traffic Injury Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
26.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(14.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(29.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)
60.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(54.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(49.5 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(54.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Alzheimers
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Alzheimers
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(11.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cancer
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cancer
968.2
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(1,176.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(873.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cerebrovascular Disease
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cerebrovascular Disease
276.5
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(149.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(199.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
149.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(199.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(151.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Diabetes
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Diabetes
231.7
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(201.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(161.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Heart Disease
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Heart Disease
762.5
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(899.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(872.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Homicide
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Homicide
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(264.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(79.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Suicide
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Suicide
664.3
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(673.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(546.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Traffic Injury
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Traffic Injury
1,275.5
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(460.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(1,238.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Unintentional Injuries
County: Dickinson Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Unintentional Injuries
1,891.9
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(1,198.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(1,622.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Life Expectancy
County: Dickinson Life Expectancy
75.9
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(77.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Percent of Adults Who Reported Consuming Fruit Less than 1 Time Per Day
County: Dickinson Percent of Adults Who Reported Consuming Fruit Less than 1 Time Per Day
46.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(36.8% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(41.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
22.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(19.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(18.1% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson
Health / Older Adults
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Dickinson Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
11.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(12.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
County: Dickinson Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
33.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
County: Dickinson Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
41.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: Dickinson Adults 65+ with a Disability
37.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Dickinson Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
20.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Dickinson Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
3.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Dickinson Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
7.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Dickinson Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
9.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson
Health / Oral Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
County: Dickinson Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
10.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Adults who Visited a Dentist
County: Dickinson Adults who Visited a Dentist
62.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Dentist Rate
County: Dickinson Dentist Rate
22
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 101 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(63)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(33)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Percentage of Screened 3-12 Grade Students w No Dental Sealants
County: Dickinson Percentage of Screened 3-12 Grade Students w No Dental Sealants
59.5%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(61.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(57.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Percentage of Screened K-12 Grade Students w Obvious Dental Decay
County: Dickinson Percentage of Screened K-12 Grade Students w Obvious Dental Decay
16.2%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(14.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson
Health / Other Conditions
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Adults with Arthritis
County: Dickinson Adults with Arthritis
29.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Adults with Kidney Disease
County: Dickinson Adults with Kidney Disease
3.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Percent of Adults Who Were Ever Diagnosed with a Depressive Disorder
County: Dickinson Percent of Adults Who Were Ever Diagnosed with a Depressive Disorder
25.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(20.1% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
31.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson
Health / Physical Activity
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
County: Dickinson Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
20.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(22.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
15.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson
Health / Prevention & Safety
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Injury Hospital Admission Rate
County: Dickinson Injury Hospital Admission Rate
82.9
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(72.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(84.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Adults with COPD
County: Dickinson Adults with COPD
7.4%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Adults with Current Asthma
County: Dickinson Adults with Current Asthma
9.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Dickinson Asthma Hospital Admission Rate
County: Dickinson Asthma Hospital Admission Rate
3.6
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(3.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(4.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson Asthma: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson Asthma: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Hospital Admission Rate
County: Dickinson Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Hospital Admission Rate
15.7
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(17.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson COPD: Medicare Population
County: Dickinson COPD: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Pneumonia (Bacterial) Hospital Admission Rate
County: Dickinson Pneumonia (Bacterial) Hospital Admission Rate
44.1
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(20.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(44.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Sexually Transmitted Disease Rate
County: Dickinson Sexually Transmitted Disease Rate
2.3
Cases per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(6.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(1.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson
Health / Tobacco Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Adults who Smoke
County: Dickinson Adults who Smoke
16.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Dickinson Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Dickinson Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
2.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(2.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson
Health / Weight Status
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
County: Dickinson Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
36.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(36.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
County: Dickinson Percent of Adults who are Overweight
County: Dickinson Percent of Adults who are Overweight
34.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(34.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(35.3% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(31.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Value
Compared to:
County: Dickinson Frequent Physical Distress
County: Dickinson Frequent Physical Distress
11.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Dickinson Insufficient Sleep
County: Dickinson Insufficient Sleep
36.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(36.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)
76.5%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(83.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(94.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(70.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Percent of Adults with Fair or Poor Self-Perceived Health Status
County: Dickinson Percent of Adults with Fair or Poor Self-Perceived Health Status
18.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(17.7% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Dickinson Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days
County: Dickinson Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days
10.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
