Search for Indicators
County Dashboard
This dashboard shows all indicators available for the selected county. Get started by selecting your county from the list below.
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
County: Lincoln
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Adults who Binge Drink
County: Lincoln Adults who Binge Drink
15.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
34.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(31.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
15.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(15.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
9.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
16.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(15.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(19.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
42.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(37.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(47.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
77.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(71.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(73.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln
Health / Cancer
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Adults with Cancer
County: Lincoln Adults with Cancer
9.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Cancer: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Cancer: Medicare Population
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
County: Lincoln Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
82.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Colon Cancer Screening
County: Lincoln Colon Cancer Screening
63.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
County: Lincoln Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
69.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Colorectal Cancer Rate
County: Lincoln Colorectal Cancer Rate
51.4
Per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(39.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(48.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Female Breast Cancer Rate
County: Lincoln Female Breast Cancer Rate
135.1
Per 100,000 female population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(129.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(125.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Lung & Bronchus Cancer Rate
County: Lincoln Lung & Bronchus Cancer Rate
87.6
Per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(80.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Male Prostate Cancer Rate
County: Lincoln Male Prostate Cancer Rate
228.7
Per 100,000 male population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(109.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(160.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
County: Lincoln Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
69.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)
County: Lincoln Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
46.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(50.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln
Health / Diabetes
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Adults 20+ with Diabetes
County: Lincoln Adults 20+ with Diabetes
7.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Diabetes Hospital Admission Rate
County: Lincoln Diabetes Hospital Admission Rate
39.5
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(22.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Lincoln Diabetes: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Diabetes: Medicare Population
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln
Health / Disabilities
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
County: Lincoln Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
13.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(24.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Children with a Disability
County: Lincoln Children with a Disability
6.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: Lincoln Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Persons with a Disability
County: Lincoln Persons with a Disability
16.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Lincoln Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
7.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Lincoln Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Persons with a Vision Difficulty
County: Lincoln Persons with a Vision Difficulty
3.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
County: Lincoln Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
6.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
County: Lincoln Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
76.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Adults without Health Insurance
County: Lincoln Adults without Health Insurance
9.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Average Monthly WIC Participation per 1,000 population
County: Lincoln Average Monthly WIC Participation per 1,000 population
13.7
Average cases per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(16.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(22.4 in 2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value.
Prior Value
(14.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Community Spending on Health Care
County: Lincoln Community Spending on Health Care
11.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Lincoln Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Lincoln Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio
9.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(9.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Lincoln Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Lincoln Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
104
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(149)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(138)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Persons with Health Insurance
County: Lincoln Persons with Health Insurance
88.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(89.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Lincoln Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
5,004.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(2,527.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3,245.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Lincoln Primary Care Provider Rate
69
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(78)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(34)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Staffed Hospital Bed Ratio
County: Lincoln Staffed Hospital Bed Ratio
4.8
Beds per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(2.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(4.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln
Health / Health Information Technology
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Households with an Internet Subscription
County: Lincoln Households with an Internet Subscription
73.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
County: Lincoln Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
85.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Persons with an Internet Subscription
County: Lincoln Persons with an Internet Subscription
80.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(91.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Acute Cerebrovascular (Stroke) Disease Hospital Admission Rate
County: Lincoln Acute Cerebrovascular (Stroke) Disease Hospital Admission Rate
10.4
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(11.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(13.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Lincoln Adults who Experienced a Stroke
County: Lincoln Adults who Experienced a Stroke
4.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
County: Lincoln Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
8.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
County: Lincoln Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
84.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
39.9
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2016)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 104 Kansas counties.
KS Value
(48.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(72.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
23.7
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2015)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
KS Value
(25.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(25.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Lincoln Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Cholesterol Test History
County: Lincoln Cholesterol Test History
85.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Congestive Heart Failure Hospital Admission Rate
County: Lincoln Congestive Heart Failure Hospital Admission Rate
16.7
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(24.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(22.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Lincoln Heart Disease Hospital Admission Rate
County: Lincoln Heart Disease Hospital Admission Rate
108.8
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(111.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(125.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Lincoln Heart Failure: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Heart Failure: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln High Blood Pressure Prevalence
County: Lincoln High Blood Pressure Prevalence
40.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)
County: Lincoln High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
County: Lincoln High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
41.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
55.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(54.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Hypertension: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Hypertension: Medicare Population
67.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(67.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Stroke: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Stroke: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
County: Lincoln COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
0.0
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
(Sep 30, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 97 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(0.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
County: Lincoln COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
10.01
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.10)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.01)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
42.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(40.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Percent of Infants Fully Immunized at 24 Months
County: Lincoln Percent of Infants Fully Immunized at 24 Months
75.0%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(96.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
County: Lincoln Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
45.2%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(45.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Infant Mortality Rate
County: Lincoln Infant Mortality Rate
0.0
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2010-2014)
Compared to:
KS Value
(6.3)
The county and regional values are compared to Kansas State value.
US Value
(5.9 in 2012-2016)
The regional value is compared to the most current national value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
County: Lincoln Number of Births per 1,000 Population
County: Lincoln Number of Births per 1,000 Population
9.2
Births per 1,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.8 in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(9.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Percent of all Births Occurring to Teens (15-19)
County: Lincoln Percent of all Births Occurring to Teens (15-19)
9.4%
(2011-2013)
Compared to:
KS Value
(8.1%)
Births with unknown values are excluded from the denominator for this calculation. The County and Regional values are compared to the Kansas State value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account while making this comparison.
US Value
(7.7%)
Births with unknown values are excluded from the denominator for this calculation. The Kansas State Value is compared to the US Value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account while making the comparison with the state.
Prior Value
(9.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Percent of Births Occurring to Unmarried Women
County: Lincoln Percent of Births Occurring to Unmarried Women
21.0%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(39.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(23.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Percent of births Where Mother Smoked During Pregnancy
County: Lincoln Percent of births Where Mother Smoked During Pregnancy
6.2%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.9% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Percent of Births Where Prenatal Care began in First Trimester
County: Lincoln Percent of Births Where Prenatal Care began in First Trimester
87.2%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(81.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(77.3% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(91.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(80.5%)
County: Lincoln Percent of Births with Inadequate Birth Spacing
County: Lincoln Percent of Births with Inadequate Birth Spacing
9.7%
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
KS Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Percent of Births with Low Birth Weight
County: Lincoln Percent of Births with Low Birth Weight
9.9%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(8.3% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Percent of WIC Mothers Breastfeeding Exclusively
County: Lincoln Percent of WIC Mothers Breastfeeding Exclusively
33.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(21.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Percentage of Premature Births
County: Lincoln Percentage of Premature Births
12.3%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(9.9% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(9.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
County: Lincoln
Health / Medications & Prescriptions
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Poisoning (Drugs) Hospital Admission Rate
County: Lincoln Poisoning (Drugs) Hospital Admission Rate
0.0
Per 10,000 population
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(1.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
County: Lincoln
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
County: Lincoln Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
19.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Depression: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Depression: Medicare Population
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Frequent Mental Distress
County: Lincoln Frequent Mental Distress
15.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Lincoln Mental Behavior Hospital Admissions Rate
County: Lincoln Mental Behavior Hospital Admissions Rate
38.3
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(70.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(49.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Lincoln Mental Health Provider Rate
County: Lincoln Mental Health Provider Rate
35
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 84 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(238)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(34)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
County: Lincoln Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
14.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln
Health / Mortality Data
Value
Compared to:
0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(23.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(31.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
County: Lincoln Age-adjusted Cancer Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
County: Lincoln Age-adjusted Cancer Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
139.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(151.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(152.5 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(144.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
44.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(35.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(37.6 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(33.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
31.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(47.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(40.9 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(31.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Age-adjusted Diabetes Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
County: Lincoln Age-adjusted Diabetes Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
39.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(25.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(21.3 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
County: Lincoln Age-adjusted Heart Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
County: Lincoln Age-adjusted Heart Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
154.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(162.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(165.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(159.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Age-adjusted Homicide Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
County: Lincoln Age-adjusted Homicide Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(5.7 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
County: Lincoln Age-adjusted Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
County: Lincoln Age-adjusted Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
666.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(795.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(733.1 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(579.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(14.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(13.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(46.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Lincoln Age-adjusted Suicide Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
County: Lincoln Age-adjusted Suicide Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(14.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(13.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)
0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(48.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(43.2 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(33.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Alzheimers
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Alzheimers
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(11.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cancer
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cancer
732.8
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(1,176.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(917.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(149.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(199.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(133.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Diabetes
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Diabetes
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(201.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Heart Disease
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Heart Disease
824.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(899.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(1,443.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Homicide
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Homicide
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(264.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(79.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Suicide
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Suicide
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(673.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Traffic Injury
County: Lincoln Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Traffic Injury
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(460.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(1,198.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(240.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Life Expectancy
County: Lincoln Life Expectancy
77.6
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(77.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln
Health / Older Adults
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Lincoln Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
11.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(12.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Lincoln Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
County: Lincoln Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
38.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
County: Lincoln Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
41.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: Lincoln Adults 65+ with a Disability
27.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Lincoln Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
12.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Lincoln Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
3.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Lincoln Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Lincoln Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
7.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln
Health / Oral Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
County: Lincoln Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
10.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Adults who Visited a Dentist
County: Lincoln Adults who Visited a Dentist
63.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Dentist Rate
County: Lincoln Dentist Rate
0
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 101 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(63)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Percentage of Screened 3-12 Grade Students w No Dental Sealants
County: Lincoln Percentage of Screened 3-12 Grade Students w No Dental Sealants
56.0%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(61.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(67.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
15.3%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(16.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln
Health / Other Conditions
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Adults with Arthritis
County: Lincoln Adults with Arthritis
34.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Adults with Kidney Disease
County: Lincoln Adults with Kidney Disease
3.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
30.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(30.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln
Health / Physical Activity
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
County: Lincoln Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
18.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(17.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln
Health / Prevention & Safety
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Injury Hospital Admission Rate
County: Lincoln Injury Hospital Admission Rate
68.9
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(72.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(83.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Lincoln
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Adults with COPD
County: Lincoln Adults with COPD
8.8%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Adults with Current Asthma
County: Lincoln Adults with Current Asthma
9.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Asthma: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln Asthma: Medicare Population
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
26.0
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(28.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Lincoln COPD: Medicare Population
County: Lincoln COPD: Medicare Population
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Pneumonia (Bacterial) Hospital Admission Rate
County: Lincoln Pneumonia (Bacterial) Hospital Admission Rate
34.5
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(20.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(31.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Lincoln
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Sexually Transmitted Disease Rate
County: Lincoln Sexually Transmitted Disease Rate
4.1
Cases per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(6.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(1.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln
Health / Tobacco Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Adults who Smoke
County: Lincoln Adults who Smoke
16.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Lincoln Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Lincoln Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
2.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(3.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Lincoln
Health / Weight Status
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
County: Lincoln Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
27.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(25.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
County: Lincoln
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Frequent Physical Distress
County: Lincoln Frequent Physical Distress
11.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Lincoln Insufficient Sleep
County: Lincoln Insufficient Sleep
32.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(33.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)
County: Lincoln Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days
County: Lincoln Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days
12.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair
County: Lincoln Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair
16.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Lincoln
Community
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Child Opportunity Index
County: Lincoln
Community / Civic Engagement
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Voter Turnout: Presidential Election
County: Lincoln Voter Turnout: Presidential Election
70.0%
(2016)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
KS Value
(67.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(67.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(58.4%)
<div>SDOH-07: Increase the proportion of the voting-age citizens who vote</div>
County: Lincoln
Community / Crime & Crime Prevention
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Rate of Violent Crime per 1,000 Population
County: Lincoln Rate of Violent Crime per 1,000 Population
1.3
Crimes per 1,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(4.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(3.6 in 2014)
The Kansas State value is compared to the US value. Under reporting of crime by some public safety jurisdictions may result in lower rates.
Prior Value
(0.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln
Community / Demographics
Value
Compared to:
County: Lincoln Average Household Size
County: Lincoln Average Household Size
2.40
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(2.50)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Female Population
County: Lincoln Female Population
49.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Foreign Born Persons
County: Lincoln Foreign Born Persons
0.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Households
County: Lincoln Households
1,223
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Lincoln Male Population
County: Lincoln Male Population
50.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(50.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
0.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
