Home > Promising Practices > CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Use of Safety Belts: Enhanced Enforcement Programs

CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Use of Safety Belts: Enhanced Enforcement Programs

CDC

An Evidence-Based Practice

Description

Enhanced enforcement programs are added to normal enforcement practices and include publicity. They fall into two categories: (1) those that increase citations along with increasing the number of officers on patrol (supplemental), and (2) programs that promote more citations during an officer's normal patrol (targeted).

The Community Preventive Services Task Force recommends enhanced enforcement programs based on strong evidence of their effectiveness in increasing safety belt use and reducing fatal and nonfatal injuries in a wide range of settings and among various populations.

Results / Accomplishments

Results from the Systematic Reviews:
Fifteen studies qualified for the systematic review.

• Observed safety belt use: median increase of 16 percentage points (interquartile interval: 8 to 24 percentage points; 15 studies)
• Increases in safety belt use were similar for supplemental and targeted patrols.
• Fatal and nonfatal injuries combined: decreases of 7% and 15% (2 studies)

About this Promising Practice

Primary Contact
The Community Guide
1600 Clifton Rd, NE
MS E69
Atlanta, GA 30329
(404) 498-1827
communityguide@cdc.gov
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/
Topics
Health / Prevention & Safety
Community / Governance
Community / Transportation
Source
Community Guide Branch Epidemiology and Analysis Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Location
USA
For more details
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/motor-v...
Target Audience
Adults

Related Promising Practices

  1. Tribal Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention Programs
  2. CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Use of Safety Belts: Laws Mandating Use
  3. CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Use of Safety Belts: Primary (vs. Secondary) Enforcement Laws

More

Related Content for: CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Use of Safety Belts: Enhanced Enforcement Programs

An Evidence-Based Practice meets the following HCI criteria:

  1. The program description includes at a minimum: the sponsoring organization, program goals, program implementation steps, and outcomes that have demonstrated program success in achieving the program goal in one or more localities.
  2. The results from an evaluation of the program include quantitative measures showing improvement in the outcome(s) of interest after the implementation of the program (i.e. increase in smoking cessation, not just the delivery of a smoking cessation program). The outcome measure(s) is/are compared at relevant time periods before and after the intervention or program implementation. Alternatively, the evaluation study compares the outcome(s) between an intervention group and an appropriate control group.
  3. The study is of peer-review quality and presents numbers in a scientific manner; measurements of precision and reliability are included (e.g. confidence intervals, standard errors), results from statistical tests show a significant difference or change in the outcome measure(s), and relevant point estimates and p-values are presented. Note: if the results from an evaluation of a program are presented in a scientific manner and the outcome measure is improved compared to the baseline measurement or the control group but the difference is not statistically significant, the practice is classified as effective and not evidence-based.

Kansas Health Indicators

Kansas Health Matters