Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

State: Kansas

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Current Value:
18.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 18.0 which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.1.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Kansas has a value of 18.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

State: Kansas Percent Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Having Daily Opioid Dosage >= 50 MME

33.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (33.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (35.7%).
Prior Value
(35.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percent Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Having Daily Opioid Dosage >= 90 MME

16.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (16.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (17.8%).
Prior Value
(17.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percent Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Receiving Both Long & Short Acting Opioids

7.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (7.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.2%).
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percent Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Receiving Opioid & Benzodiazepine Prescriptions

15.1%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (15.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.5%).
Prior Value
(16.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percent of Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Receiving Opioids Supply Greater Than 10-Days

37.8%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (37.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (44.9%).
Prior Value
(44.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percent of Medicare Part D Claims With Opioid Prescriptions Written For More Than 10-Day Supply

71.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (71.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (70.3%).
Prior Value
(70.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Kansas has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Colorectal Cancer Rate

Current Value:

State: Kansas Colorectal Cancer Rate

39.2
Per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (39.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.1).
Prior Value
(39.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Female Breast Cancer Rate

Current Value:
129.0
Per 100,000 female population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (129.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (126.0).
Prior Value
(126.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Lung & Bronchus Cancer Rate

Current Value:
54.0
Per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (54.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (55.7).
Prior Value
(55.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Male Prostate Cancer Rate

Current Value:
109.8
Per 100,000 male population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (109.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (108.6).
Prior Value
(108.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
50.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 46.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Kansas has a value of 50.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (50.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (49.0%).
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Diabetes Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
16.5
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (16.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.9).
Prior Value
(16.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
24.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Kansas has a value of 24.0%.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (24.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.0%).
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
24.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 24.6% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Kansas has a value of 24.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Children with a Disability

Current Value:
4.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Kansas has a value of 4.8%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Kansas has a value of 5.6%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Persons with a Disability

Current Value:
13.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Kansas has a value of 13.4%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Kansas has a value of 4.2%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Kansas has a value of 2.2%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
2.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Kansas has a value of 2.4%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
6.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Kansas has a value of 6.5%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Average Monthly WIC Participation per 1,000 population

16.0
Average cases per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (22.4), Kansas has a value of 16.0.
US Value
(22.4 in 2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (16.0) is greater  than the previously measured value (15.0).
Prior Value
(15.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Community Spending on Health Care

Current Value:
8.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Kansas has a value of 8.6%.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (8.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
6.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 6.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (6.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
149
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 149 which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 140 while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 125.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (149) is greater and better than the previously measured value (140).
Prior Value
(140)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
89.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 89.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (89.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (89.7%).
Prior Value
(89.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

State: Kansas Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
60.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Kansas has a value of 60.2%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (60.2%) is greater  than the previously measured value (59.7%).
Prior Value
(59.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
17.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Kansas has a value of 17.7%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (17.7%) is less  than the previously measured value (18.2%).
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

2,527.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 2,527.0 which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,617.0 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,014.0.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Kansas has a value of 2,527.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (2,527.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (2,578.0).
Prior Value
(2,578.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
78
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 78 which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76 while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 68.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (78) is less and worse than the previously measured value (79).
Prior Value
(79)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Staffed Hospital Bed Ratio

Current Value:
2.7
Beds per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (2.7) is less  than the previously measured value (2.9).
Prior Value
(2.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
88.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 88.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Kansas has a value of 88.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

94.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 94.2% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.5% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Kansas has a value of 94.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
91.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 91.1% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Kansas has a value of 91.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Acute Cerebrovascular (Stroke) Disease Hospital Admission Rate

11.6
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (11.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.9).
Prior Value
(11.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
47.3
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (47.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (46.7).
Prior Value
(46.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack

25.6
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (25.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (24.9).
Prior Value
(24.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Kansas has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (15.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Congestive Heart Failure Hospital Admission Rate

24.1
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (24.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.7).
Prior Value
(24.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas Heart Disease Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
111.9
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (111.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (117.1).
Prior Value
(117.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Kansas has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
63.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 63.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 64.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Kansas has a value of 63.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (63.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (62.0%).
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
66.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 66.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 69.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Kansas has a value of 66.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (66.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.0%).
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 21.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Kansas has a value of 21.0%.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (21.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.0%).
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percent of Adults with Diagnosed Hypertension

Current Value:
34.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (32.3%), Kansas has a value of 34.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.3% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (34.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.8%).
Prior Value
(32.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.7%)

State: Kansas Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Kansas has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Current Value:
0.5
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 0.5 which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.9.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 49 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (1.7), Kansas has a value of 0.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (0.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0.1).
Prior Value
(0.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Current Value:
11.10
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 11.10 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.02 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.68.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), Kansas has a value of 11.10 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (11.10) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.86).
Prior Value
(10.86)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
50.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Kansas has a value of 50.0%.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (50.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (49.0%).
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percent of Infants Fully Immunized at 24 Months

71.1%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (71.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (69.2%).
Prior Value
(69.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Kansas has a value of 7.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (7.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

State: Kansas Infant Mortality Rate

5.9
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.9), Kansas has a value of 5.9.
US Value
(5.9 in 2012-2016)
The regional value is compared to the most current national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (5.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0).
Prior Value
(6.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)

State: Kansas Number of Births per 1,000 Population

Current Value:
11.9
Births per 1,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (12.5), Kansas has a value of 11.9.
US Value
(12.5 in 2013-2015)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. Three-year time period for this comparison is 2013-2015, this is the most current US data at this time.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (11.9) is less  than the previously measured value (12.1).
Prior Value
(12.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percent of all Births Occurring to Teens (15-19)

5.0%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (18.8%), Kansas has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.2%).
Prior Value
(5.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percent of Births Occurring to Unmarried Women

Current Value:
36.4%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (39.8%), Kansas has a value of 36.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(39.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (36.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.5%).
Prior Value
(36.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percent of births Where Mother Smoked During Pregnancy

7.9%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.9%), Kansas has a value of 7.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.9% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (7.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.7%).
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percent of Births Where Prenatal Care began in First Trimester

81.3%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (77.3%), Kansas has a value of 81.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(77.3% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (81.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.0%).
Prior Value
(81.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.5%)

State: Kansas Percent of Births with Inadequate Birth Spacing

10.2%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.8%), Kansas has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (10.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.1%).
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percent of Births with Low Birth Weight

Current Value:
7.4%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Kansas has a value of 7.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.3% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (7.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.4%).
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percent of WIC Mothers Breastfeeding Exclusively

18.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (18.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (16.3%).
Prior Value
(16.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percentage of Premature Births

Current Value:
10.0%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (9.9%), Kansas has a value of 10.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.9% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.8%).
Prior Value
(9.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)

State: Kansas

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Poisoning (Drugs) Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
3.5
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (3.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.6).
Prior Value
(3.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 18.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Kansas has a value of 18.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (18.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.0%).
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Frequent Mental Distress

Current Value:

State: Kansas Frequent Mental Distress

14.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 14.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 49 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Kansas has a value of 14.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (14.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.6%).
Prior Value
(12.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas Mental Behavior Hospital Admissions Rate

Current Value:
70.6
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (70.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.8).
Prior Value
(70.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:
238
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 238 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 315 while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 227.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (238) is greater and better than the previously measured value (224).
Prior Value
(224)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Age-adjusted Alzheimer's Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

23.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (31.0), Kansas has a value of 23.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (23.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.9).
Prior Value
(22.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-adjusted Cancer Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

151.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (158.5), Kansas has a value of 151.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(158.5 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (151.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (152.9).
Prior Value
(152.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)

State: Kansas Age-adjusted Cerebrovascular Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

35.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (37.6), Kansas has a value of 35.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.6 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (35.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.5).
Prior Value
(35.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

State: Kansas Age-adjusted Chronic Lower Respiratory Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

47.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (40.9), Kansas has a value of 47.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(40.9 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (47.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (49.7).
Prior Value
(49.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-adjusted Diabetes Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

25.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (21.3), Kansas has a value of 25.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.3 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (25.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.8).
Prior Value
(23.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-adjusted Heart Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

162.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (165.0), Kansas has a value of 162.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(165.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (162.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (158.7).
Prior Value
(158.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-adjusted Homicide Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

5.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.7), Kansas has a value of 5.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.7 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (5.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.6).
Prior Value
(5.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)

State: Kansas Age-adjusted Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

795.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (731.9), Kansas has a value of 795.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(731.9 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (795.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (759.2).
Prior Value
(759.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-adjusted Nephritis, Nephrotic Syndrome, Nephrosis Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

14.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Kansas has a value of 14.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (14.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0).
Prior Value
(15.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-adjusted Suicide Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

18.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (14.0), Kansas has a value of 18.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (18.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.7).
Prior Value
(18.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)

State: Kansas Age-adjusted Traffic Injury Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

13.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.4), Kansas has a value of 13.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (13.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.1).
Prior Value
(14.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)

State: Kansas Age-adjusted Unintentional Injuries Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

48.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (49.5), Kansas has a value of 48.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.5 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (48.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.2).
Prior Value
(47.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

State: Kansas Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Alzheimers

11.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (11.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.3).
Prior Value
(10.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cancer

1,176.7
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (1,176.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1,180.8).
Prior Value
(1,180.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cerebrovascular Disease

149.9
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (149.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (146.9).
Prior Value
(146.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Chronic Lower Respiratory Disease

199.2
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (199.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (206.1).
Prior Value
(206.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Diabetes

201.3
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (201.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (193.1).
Prior Value
(193.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Heart Disease

899.4
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (899.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (855.0).
Prior Value
(855.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Homicide

264.9
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (264.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (248.8).
Prior Value
(248.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Nephritis, Nephrotic Syndrome Nephrosis

79.2
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (79.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (74.4).
Prior Value
(74.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Suicide

673.8
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (673.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (672.0).
Prior Value
(672.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Traffic Injury

460.5
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (460.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (484.2).
Prior Value
(484.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Unintentional Injuries

1,198.7
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (1,198.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1,127.7).
Prior Value
(1,127.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Percent of Adults Who Reported Consuming Fruit Less than 1 Time Per Day

43.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (36.8%), Kansas has a value of 43.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.8% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (43.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (37.5%).
Prior Value
(37.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas Percent of Adults Who Reported Consuming Vegetables Less than 1 Time Per Day

19.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Kansas has a value of 19.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.1% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (19.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (17.9%).
Prior Value
(17.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
11.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 11.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (11.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.3%).
Prior Value
(12.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:
33.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Kansas has a value of 33.6%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
15.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Kansas has a value of 15.5%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
5.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Kansas has a value of 5.9%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
5.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Kansas has a value of 5.8%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

11.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Kansas has a value of 11.7%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Kansas has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Dentist Rate

Current Value:

State: Kansas Dentist Rate

63
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 63 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70 while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (63) is greater and better than the previously measured value (62).
Prior Value
(62)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percentage of Screened 3-12 Grade Students w No Dental Sealants

61.3%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (61.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (61.5%).
Prior Value
(61.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percentage of Screened K-12 Grade Students w Obvious Dental Decay

13.8%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (13.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.1%).
Prior Value
(15.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Kansas has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (17.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Kansas has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (11.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percent of Adults Who Were Ever Diagnosed with a Depressive Disorder

20.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (20.1%), Kansas has a value of 20.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(20.1% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (20.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.9%).
Prior Value
(20.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

34.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 34.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Kansas has a value of 34.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (34.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (32.0%).
Prior Value
(32.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Percent of Adults Doing Enough Physical Activity To Meet Both The Aerobic AND Strengthening Exercise Recommendations

19.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (20.3%), Kansas has a value of 19.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (19.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.3%).
Prior Value
(19.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms

Current Value:
14.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 14.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.8 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.9.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Kansas has a value of 14.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (14.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.5).
Prior Value
(14.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)

State: Kansas Injury Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
72.0
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (72.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (73.3).
Prior Value
(73.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Asthma Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
3.0
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (3.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.5).
Prior Value
(3.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Kansas has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Hospital Admission Rate

9.8
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (9.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.5).
Prior Value
(12.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Kansas has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Pneumonia (Bacterial) Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
20.2
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (20.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (21.7).
Prior Value
(21.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Sexually Transmitted Disease Rate

Current Value:
6.1
Cases per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (6.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.7).
Prior Value
(6.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
2.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 2.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (2.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.2%).
Prior Value
(2.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Percent of Adults who are Overweight

Current Value:
34.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (35.3%), Kansas has a value of 34.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.3% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (34.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.8%).
Prior Value
(34.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Frequent Physical Distress

Current Value:
11.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 49 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Kansas has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Kansas Percent of Adults Who Reported That They Always Wear a Seatbelt When They Drive or Ride in a Car

83.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (94.3%), Kansas has a value of 83.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (83.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.0%).
Prior Value
(83.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percent of Adults with Fair or Poor Self-Perceived Health Status

14.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.7%), Kansas has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.7% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (14.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.7%).
Prior Value
(16.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Voter Turnout: Presidential Election

Current Value:
67.4%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (67.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (66.8%).
Prior Value
(66.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (58.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(58.4%)
<div>SDOH-07: Increase the proportion of the voting-age citizens who vote</div>

State: Kansas

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Current Value:
5.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 5.9 which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.2 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (6.6), Kansas has a value of 5.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (5.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.7).
Prior Value
(5.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

State: Kansas Rate of Violent Crime per 1,000 Population

Current Value:
4.4
Crimes per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.7), Kansas has a value of 4.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.7 in 2015)
The Kansas State value is compared to the US value. Under reporting of crime by some public safety jurisdictions may result in lower rates.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (4.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.6).
Prior Value
(4.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Average Household Size

Current Value:

State: Kansas Average Household Size

2.50
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Kansas has a value of 2.50.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Female Population

Current Value:

State: Kansas Female Population

49.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (50.4%), Kansas has a value of 49.8%.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (49.8%) is greater  than the previously measured value (49.7%).
Prior Value
(49.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

State: Kansas Foreign Born Persons

7.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Kansas has a value of 7.1%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Households

Current Value:

State: Kansas Households

1,148,635
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Male Population

Current Value:

State: Kansas Male Population

50.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (49.6%), Kansas has a value of 50.2%.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (50.2%) is less  than the previously measured value (50.3%).
Prior Value
(50.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Population Age 5+ with Language Other than English Spoken at Home

11.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Kansas has a value of 11.8%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Population American Indian and Alaska Native

Current Value:
1.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Kansas has a value of 1.2%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (1.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.2%).
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Population Asian

Current Value:

State: Kansas Population Asian

3.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.3%), Kansas has a value of 3.2%.
US Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (3.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.2%).
Prior Value
(3.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Population Black or African American

Current Value:
6.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Kansas has a value of 6.2%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (6.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.2%).
Prior Value
(6.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Population Hispanic or Latino

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (19.1%), Kansas has a value of 13.0%.
US Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (13.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (12.8%).
Prior Value
(12.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander

0.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (0.3%), Kansas has a value of 0.2%.
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (0.2%) is greater  than the previously measured value (0.1%).
Prior Value
(0.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Population Over Age 65

Current Value:

State: Kansas Population Over Age 65

17.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.3%), Kansas has a value of 17.2%.
US Value
(17.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (17.2%) is greater  than the previously measured value (16.7%).
Prior Value
(16.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Current Value:
478,994
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Population Two or More Races

Current Value:
3.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.0%), Kansas has a value of 3.3%.
US Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (3.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.3%).
Prior Value
(3.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Population Under Age 18

Current Value:

State: Kansas Population Under Age 18

23.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Kansas has a value of 23.5%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (23.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (23.7%).
Prior Value
(23.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Population Under Age 5

Current Value:

State: Kansas Population Under Age 5

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.6%), Kansas has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Population White

Current Value:

State: Kansas Population White

85.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (75.5%), Kansas has a value of 85.9%.
US Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (85.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.9%).
Prior Value
(85.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)

Current Value:
74.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (58.9%), Kansas has a value of 74.3%.
US Value
(58.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (74.3%) is less  than the previously measured value (74.6%).
Prior Value
(74.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Ratio of Children to Adults

Current Value:
31.2
Children per 100 Adults
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (28.5), Kansas has a value of 31.2.
US Value
(28.5 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (31.2) is less  than the previously measured value (31.3).
Prior Value
(31.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Ratio of Elderly Persons and Children to Adults

57.7
Elderly persons & children per 100 adults
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (52.3), Kansas has a value of 57.7.
US Value
(52.3 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (57.7) is greater  than the previously measured value (56.9).
Prior Value
(56.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Ratio of Elderly Persons to Adults

Current Value:
26.4
Elderly persons per 100 adults
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (23.8), Kansas has a value of 26.4.
US Value
(23.8 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (26.4) is greater  than the previously measured value (25.6).
Prior Value
(25.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Total Population

Current Value:

State: Kansas Total Population

2,937,150
People
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (2,937,150) is less  than the previously measured value (2,937,922).
Prior Value
(2,937,922)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Veteran Population

Current Value:

State: Kansas Veteran Population

7.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Kansas has a value of 7.4%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:
19.9%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 19.9% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.9% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Kansas has a value of 19.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (19.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.4%).
Prior Value
(19.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

State: Kansas People 65+ Living Alone

28.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Kansas has a value of 28.8% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Kansas has a value of 28.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:
137,903
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Kansas Health Matters