Search for Indicators
All Data
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.
County: Riley
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Adults who Binge Drink
County: Riley Adults who Binge Drink
23.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
County: Riley Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
7.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,797 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(14.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(23.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
34.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(37.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
18.5%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(20.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
7.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
13.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(15.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
30.8%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(37.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(39.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
63.8%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(71.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(62.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley
Health / Cancer
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Adults with Cancer
County: Riley Adults with Cancer
4.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Cancer: Medicare Population
County: Riley Cancer: Medicare Population
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
County: Riley Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
77.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Colon Cancer Screening
County: Riley Colon Cancer Screening
64.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
County: Riley Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
72.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Colorectal Cancer Rate
County: Riley Colorectal Cancer Rate
38.9
Per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(39.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(33.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Female Breast Cancer Rate
County: Riley Female Breast Cancer Rate
129.8
Per 100,000 female population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(129.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(124.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Lung & Bronchus Cancer Rate
County: Riley Lung & Bronchus Cancer Rate
54.9
Per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(55.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Male Prostate Cancer Rate
County: Riley Male Prostate Cancer Rate
153.5
Per 100,000 male population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(109.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(121.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
County: Riley Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
71.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)
County: Riley Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
County: Riley Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
54.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(53.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley
Health / Diabetes
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Adults 20+ with Diabetes
County: Riley Adults 20+ with Diabetes
7.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Diabetes Hospital Admission Rate
County: Riley Diabetes Hospital Admission Rate
10.6
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(10.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Riley Diabetes: Medicare Population
County: Riley Diabetes: Medicare Population
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley
Health / Disabilities
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
County: Riley Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
26.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(24.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Children with a Disability
County: Riley Children with a Disability
4.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: Riley Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Persons with a Disability
County: Riley Persons with a Disability
12.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Riley Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Riley Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Persons with a Vision Difficulty
County: Riley Persons with a Vision Difficulty
2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
County: Riley Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
County: Riley Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
70.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Adults without Health Insurance
County: Riley Adults without Health Insurance
10.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Average Monthly WIC Participation per 1,000 population
County: Riley Average Monthly WIC Participation per 1,000 population
31.3
Average cases per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(16.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(22.4 in 2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value.
Prior Value
(26.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Community Spending on Health Care
County: Riley Community Spending on Health Care
7.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Riley Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Riley Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio
7.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Riley Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Riley Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
125
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(140)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(128)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Persons with Health Insurance
County: Riley Persons with Health Insurance
89.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(89.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Riley Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
County: Riley Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
69.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(60.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(73.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
County: Riley Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
12.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
County: Riley Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
1,523.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(2,527.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1,563.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Riley Primary Care Provider Rate
75
Providers per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 97 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,995 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(79)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(70)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Staffed Hospital Bed Ratio
County: Riley Staffed Hospital Bed Ratio
1.5
Beds per 1,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(2.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(1.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley
Health / Health Information Technology
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Households with an Internet Subscription
County: Riley Households with an Internet Subscription
90.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
County: Riley Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
97.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Persons with an Internet Subscription
County: Riley Persons with an Internet Subscription
92.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(91.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Value
Compared to:
9.1
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(11.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(9.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Riley Adults who Experienced a Stroke
County: Riley Adults who Experienced a Stroke
2.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
County: Riley Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
4.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
71.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Riley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
63.4
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2019)
Compared to:
KS Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 104 Kansas counties.
KS Value
(46.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(55.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Riley Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
25.9
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2015)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
KS Value
(25.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(22.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Riley Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
County: Riley Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Cholesterol Test History
County: Riley Cholesterol Test History
71.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Congestive Heart Failure Hospital Admission Rate
County: Riley Congestive Heart Failure Hospital Admission Rate
18.2
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(24.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(18.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Riley Heart Disease Hospital Admission Rate
County: Riley Heart Disease Hospital Admission Rate
100.5
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(111.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(107.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Riley Heart Failure: Medicare Population
County: Riley Heart Failure: Medicare Population
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley High Blood Pressure Prevalence
County: Riley High Blood Pressure Prevalence
23.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)
County: Riley High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
County: Riley High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
28.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
County: Riley Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
66.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(65.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Hypertension: Medicare Population
County: Riley Hypertension: Medicare Population
67.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
County: Riley Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Percent of Adults with Diagnosed Hypertension
County: Riley Percent of Adults with Diagnosed Hypertension
15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(32.3% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(27.7%)
County: Riley Stroke: Medicare Population
County: Riley Stroke: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
County: Riley COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
0.0
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
(Sep 30, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 97 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(0.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
County: Riley COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
5.54
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.10)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.51)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Riley Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
64.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(61.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Percent of Infants Fully Immunized at 24 Months
County: Riley Percent of Infants Fully Immunized at 24 Months
76.7%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
KS Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(67.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
County: Riley Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
41.6%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(41.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Riley Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Infant Mortality Rate
County: Riley Infant Mortality Rate
5.9
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(6.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(5.9 in 2012-2016)
The regional value is compared to the most current national value.
Prior Value
(5.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
County: Riley Number of Births per 1,000 Population
County: Riley Number of Births per 1,000 Population
10.1
Births per 1,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(12.5 in 2013-2015)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. Three-year time period for this comparison is 2013-2015, this is the most current US data at this time.
Prior Value
(10.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Percent of all Births Occurring to Teens (15-19)
County: Riley Percent of all Births Occurring to Teens (15-19)
2.9%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(18.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(3.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Percent of Births Occurring to Unmarried Women
County: Riley Percent of Births Occurring to Unmarried Women
22.7%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(39.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(22.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Percent of births Where Mother Smoked During Pregnancy
County: Riley Percent of births Where Mother Smoked During Pregnancy
5.9%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.9% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(6.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
81.5%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(81.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(77.3% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(81.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(80.5%)
County: Riley Percent of Births with Inadequate Birth Spacing
County: Riley Percent of Births with Inadequate Birth Spacing
11.0%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Percent of Births with Low Birth Weight
County: Riley Percent of Births with Low Birth Weight
7.0%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(8.3% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Percent of WIC Mothers Breastfeeding Exclusively
County: Riley Percent of WIC Mothers Breastfeeding Exclusively
25.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(27.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Percentage of Premature Births
County: Riley Percentage of Premature Births
8.1%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(9.9% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
County: Riley
Health / Medications & Prescriptions
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Poisoning (Drugs) Hospital Admission Rate
County: Riley Poisoning (Drugs) Hospital Admission Rate
2.1
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(3.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(2.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Riley
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
County: Riley Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
21.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Depression: Medicare Population
County: Riley Depression: Medicare Population
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Mental Behavior Hospital Admissions Rate
County: Riley Mental Behavior Hospital Admissions Rate
34.3
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(70.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(38.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Riley Mental Health Provider Rate
County: Riley Mental Health Provider Rate
289
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,941 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(224)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(268)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
County: Riley Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley
Health / Mortality Data
Value
Compared to:
39.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(23.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(31.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(40.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
130.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(151.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(152.5 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(135.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
35.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(35.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(37.6 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(39.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
37.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(47.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(41.6 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(34.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
17.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(25.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(21.3 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(17.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
139.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(162.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(165.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(134.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(5.7 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(2.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
County: Riley Age-adjusted Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
County: Riley Age-adjusted Mortality Rate per 100,000 population
686.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(795.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(733.1 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(666.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
7.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(14.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(13.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(6.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
12.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(13.3 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(12.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
6.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(13.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(6.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)
32.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(48.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(43.2 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Prior Value
(30.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
County: Riley Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Alzheimers
County: Riley Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Alzheimers
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
KS Value
(10.8)
The County / Region values are compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cancer
County: Riley Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cancer
965.5
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(1,176.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(945.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
53.5
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(149.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(125.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
126.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(199.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(103.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Diabetes
County: Riley Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Diabetes
96.8
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(201.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(120.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
743.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(899.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(726.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Homicide
County: Riley Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Homicide
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(264.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(121.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(79.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(45.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Suicide
County: Riley Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Suicide
427.3
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(673.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(410.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
186.2
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(460.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(170.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
664.1
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(1,198.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(596.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Life Expectancy
County: Riley Life Expectancy
80.5
Years
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,072 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(77.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(78.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(80.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
Value
Compared to:
36.1%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(37.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(36.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
14.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(17.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley
Health / Older Adults
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Riley Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
14.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(14.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
42.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
51.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: Riley Adults 65+ with a Disability
25.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Riley Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
13.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Riley Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
3.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Riley Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
5.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Riley Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
7.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
KS Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Riley Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley
Health / Oral Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
County: Riley Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
9.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Adults who Visited a Dentist
County: Riley Adults who Visited a Dentist
67.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Dentist Rate
County: Riley Dentist Rate
58
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 101 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,056 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(62)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(60)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
49.5%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(61.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(51.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
15.2%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(11.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley
Health / Other Conditions
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Adults with Arthritis
County: Riley Adults with Arthritis
17.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Adults with Kidney Disease
County: Riley Adults with Kidney Disease
2.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Riley Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Riley Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
19.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(20.1% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
35.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(35.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley
Health / Physical Activity
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
County: Riley Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
16.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(15.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
25.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley
Health / Prevention & Safety
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Injury Hospital Admission Rate
County: Riley Injury Hospital Admission Rate
54.0
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(72.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(51.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Riley
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Adults with COPD
County: Riley Adults with COPD
4.8%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Adults with Current Asthma
County: Riley Adults with Current Asthma
10.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Riley Asthma Hospital Admission Rate
County: Riley Asthma Hospital Admission Rate
0.8
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(3.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(0.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Riley Asthma: Medicare Population
County: Riley Asthma: Medicare Population
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
4.5
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(7.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Riley COPD: Medicare Population
County: Riley COPD: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Pneumonia (Bacterial) Hospital Admission Rate
County: Riley Pneumonia (Bacterial) Hospital Admission Rate
10.1
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
KS Value
(20.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(12.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Riley
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Sexually Transmitted Disease Rate
County: Riley Sexually Transmitted Disease Rate
6.1
Cases per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Value
(6.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(9.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley
Health / Tobacco Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Adults who Smoke
County: Riley Adults who Smoke
13.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Riley Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Riley Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
2.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Prior Value
(2.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Riley
Health / Weight Status
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
County: Riley Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
27.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(25.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
County: Riley Percent of Adults who are Overweight
County: Riley Percent of Adults who are Overweight
32.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(34.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(35.3% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(31.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Value
Compared to:
County: Riley Insufficient Sleep
County: Riley Insufficient Sleep
31.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
KS Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(32.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)
87.1%
(2017)
Compared to:
KS Value
(83.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(94.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(83.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
12.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
US Value
(17.7% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Riley Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days
County: Riley Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days
8.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
