Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Hodgeman

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Adults who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Adults who Binge Drink

15.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 15.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 15.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Hodgeman has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Percent Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Having Daily Opioid Dosage >= 50 MME

45.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (33.3%), Hodgeman has a value of 45.7% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (45.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (37.0%).
Prior Value
(37.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Percent Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Having Daily Opioid Dosage >= 90 MME

26.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (16.6%), Hodgeman has a value of 26.7% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (26.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (22.2%).
Prior Value
(22.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Percent Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Receiving Both Long & Short Acting Opioids

13.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (7.6%), Hodgeman has a value of 13.3% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (13.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.1%).
Prior Value
(11.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Percent Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Receiving Opioid & Benzodiazepine Prescriptions

19.1%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (15.1%), Hodgeman has a value of 19.1% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(15.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (19.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.9%).
Prior Value
(9.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Percent of Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Receiving Opioids Supply Greater Than 10-Days

60.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (37.8%), Hodgeman has a value of 60.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(37.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (60.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (50.7%).
Prior Value
(50.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Percent of Medicare Part D Claims With Opioid Prescriptions Written For More Than 10-Day Supply

83.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (71.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 83.3% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(71.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (83.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (82.7%).
Prior Value
(82.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Adults with Cancer

8.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 8.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 8.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 8.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Cancer: Medicare Population

8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (11.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (8.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:
82.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 82.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.6%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 82.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Hodgeman has a value of 82.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Colon Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Colon Cancer Screening

63.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 63.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 61.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.8%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 63.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Hodgeman has a value of 63.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
69.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 69.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.6%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 69.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Hodgeman has a value of 69.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Colorectal Cancer Rate

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Colorectal Cancer Rate

16.3
Per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (39.2), Hodgeman has a value of 16.3 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(39.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (16.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (56.9).
Prior Value
(56.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Female Breast Cancer Rate

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Female Breast Cancer Rate

120.5
Per 100,000 female population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (129.0), Hodgeman has a value of 120.5 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(129.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (120.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (124.8).
Prior Value
(124.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Lung & Bronchus Cancer Rate

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Lung & Bronchus Cancer Rate

58.9
Per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (54.0), Hodgeman has a value of 58.9 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (58.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (74.4).
Prior Value
(74.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Male Prostate Cancer Rate

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Male Prostate Cancer Rate

120.5
Per 100,000 male population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (109.8), Hodgeman has a value of 120.5 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(109.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (120.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (162.5).
Prior Value
(162.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:
69.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 69.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 69.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Hodgeman has a value of 69.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

County: Hodgeman Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
52.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 52.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 48.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 41.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 52.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (50.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 52.0% which is higher and better.
KS Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 52.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (52.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (56.0%).
Prior Value
(56.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Adults 20+ with Diabetes

7.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (7.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.3%).
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Diabetes Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
16.0
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (16.5), Hodgeman has a value of 16.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (16.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.2).
Prior Value
(11.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (24.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (23.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (24.0%).
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
15.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (24.6%), Hodgeman has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(24.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Hodgeman has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Children with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Children with a Disability

11.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (4.8%), Hodgeman has a value of 11.7%.
KS Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Hodgeman has a value of 11.7%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
7.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (5.6%), Hodgeman has a value of 7.8%.
KS Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Hodgeman has a value of 7.8%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Persons with a Disability

17.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (13.4%), Hodgeman has a value of 17.1%.
KS Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Hodgeman has a value of 17.1%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
8.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (4.2%), Hodgeman has a value of 8.7%.
KS Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Hodgeman has a value of 8.7%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (2.2%), Hodgeman has a value of 2.3%.
KS Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Hodgeman has a value of 2.3%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
3.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (2.4%), Hodgeman has a value of 3.6%.
KS Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Hodgeman has a value of 3.6%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
7.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (6.5%), Hodgeman has a value of 7.3%.
KS Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Hodgeman has a value of 7.3%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
74.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 74.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.8%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 74.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (73.6%), Hodgeman has a value of 74.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:
9.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Hodgeman has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Average Monthly WIC Participation per 1,000 population

9.1
Average cases per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (16.0), Hodgeman has a value of 9.1.
KS Value
(16.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.4), Hodgeman has a value of 9.1.
US Value
(22.4 in 2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (9.1) is less  than the previously measured value (9.9).
Prior Value
(9.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Community Spending on Health Care

Current Value:
11.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (8.6%), Hodgeman has a value of 11.2%.
KS Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 11.2%.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (11.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.2%).
Prior Value
(11.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
7.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 7.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 7.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (6.8%), Hodgeman has a value of 7.4% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (7.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.8%).
Prior Value
(7.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
342
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 342 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 111 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 342 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (149), Hodgeman has a value of 342 which is higher and better.
KS Value
(149)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (342) is less and worse than the previously measured value (351).
Prior Value
(351)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
85.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 85.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 85.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (89.1%), Hodgeman has a value of 85.9% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (85.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.6%).
Prior Value
(85.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Hodgeman Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
5,911.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 5,911.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,745.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,428.0.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 5,911.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (2,527.0), Hodgeman has a value of 5,911.0 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(2,527.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Hodgeman has a value of 5,911.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (5,911.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4,393.0).
Prior Value
(4,393.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Primary Care Provider Rate

117
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 117 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 117 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 29.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (78), Hodgeman has a value of 117 which is higher and better.
KS Value
(78)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (117) is greater and better than the previously measured value (112).
Prior Value
(112)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Staffed Hospital Bed Ratio

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Staffed Hospital Bed Ratio

4.7
Beds per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (2.7), Hodgeman has a value of 4.7.
KS Value
(2.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (4.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.7).
Prior Value
(4.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
78.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 78.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 78.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (88.2%), Hodgeman has a value of 78.3% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Hodgeman has a value of 78.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

85.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 85.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 85.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (94.2%), Hodgeman has a value of 85.5% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 85.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
87.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 87.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 87.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (91.1%), Hodgeman has a value of 87.3% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(91.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 87.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Acute Cerebrovascular (Stroke) Disease Hospital Admission Rate

14.7
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (11.6), Hodgeman has a value of 14.7 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(11.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (14.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.7).
Prior Value
(15.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:
3.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 3.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 3.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Hodgeman has a value of 3.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
7.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 7.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 7.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), Hodgeman has a value of 7.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

82.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 82.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 82.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Hodgeman has a value of 82.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
84.8
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 84.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 61.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 75.6.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 104 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (48.3), Hodgeman has a value of 84.8 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(48.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (84.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (91.6).
Prior Value
(91.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack

25.0
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 25.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (25.6), Hodgeman has a value of 25.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(25.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (25.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (19.5).
Prior Value
(19.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 17.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 17.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (15.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (17.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Cholesterol Test History

85.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 85.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.1%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 85.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Hodgeman has a value of 85.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Congestive Heart Failure Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
45.9
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (24.1), Hodgeman has a value of 45.9 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(24.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (45.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (46.7).
Prior Value
(46.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Heart Disease Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
155.9
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (111.9), Hodgeman has a value of 155.9 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(111.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (155.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (173.7).
Prior Value
(173.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 17.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 17.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (11.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (17.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:
36.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 36.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 36.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Hodgeman has a value of 36.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

County: Hodgeman High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:
40.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 40.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 40.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Hodgeman has a value of 40.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
56.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 56.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 56.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (63.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 56.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 56.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (56.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (57.0%).
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
68.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 68.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 69.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 68.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (66.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (68.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (71.0%).
Prior Value
(71.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 19.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 19.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (21.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 19.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 19.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (19.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (22.0%).
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Stroke: Medicare Population

8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 8.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 8.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (5.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 8.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 8.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (8.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Current Value:
0.0
Deaths per 100 cases
(Feb 24, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.3.
KS Counties
(Sep 30, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 97 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (0.1), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(0.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.4), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Current Value:
0.00
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 0.00 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.73 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.11.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 0.00 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.84 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.01.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (11.10), Hodgeman has a value of 0.00 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(11.10)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), Hodgeman has a value of 0.00 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.00) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.51).
Prior Value
(8.51)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 9.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 39.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 9.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (50.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 9.0% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 9.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (9.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (42.0%).
Prior Value
(42.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Percent of Infants Fully Immunized at 24 Months

Current Value:
87.5%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (71.1%), Hodgeman has a value of 87.5% which is higher and better.
KS Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (87.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (88.0%).
Prior Value
(88.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19

Current Value:
47.2%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 47.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 45.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 47.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (47.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.2%).
Prior Value
(47.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
3.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 3.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 4.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 3.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (7.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 3.0% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 3.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (3.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Infant Mortality Rate

12.8
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (5.9), Hodgeman has a value of 12.8 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0), Hodgeman has a value of 12.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0 in 2011-2015)
The five-year U.S. rate is compared to the five-year Kansas rate. The U.S. rate may be based on one or more years of preliminary statistics. Five-year time period for this value is 2010-2014, final 2015 data not available at national level, at this time.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (12.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)

County: Hodgeman Number of Births per 1,000 Population

Current Value:
8.9
Births per 1,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (11.9), Hodgeman has a value of 8.9.
KS Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5), Hodgeman has a value of 8.9.
US Value
(12.5 in 2013-2015)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. Three-year time period for this comparison is 2013-2015, this is the most current US data at this time.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (8.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.3).
Prior Value
(9.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Percent of all Births Occurring to Teens (15-19)

Current Value:
10.0%
(2002-2004)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (10.1%), Hodgeman has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(10.1%)
Births with unknown values are excluded from the denominator for this calculation. The county and regional values are compared to the Kansas state value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account while making this comparision.
Compared to the US Value (18.8%), Hodgeman has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.9%).
Prior Value
(12.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Percent of Births Occurring to Unmarried Women

Current Value:
19.1%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (36.4%), Hodgeman has a value of 19.1% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (39.8%), Hodgeman has a value of 19.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(39.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (19.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Percent of births Where Mother Smoked During Pregnancy

9.5%
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (12.7%), Hodgeman has a value of 9.5% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(12.7%)
The County / Region value is compared to the Kansas State Value. Total live births excludes births for which the gestational length of the baby was unknown. The trend is a comparison between the most recent and previous measurement periods. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the trend.
Compared to the US Value (6.9%), Hodgeman has a value of 9.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.9% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (9.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Percent of Births Where Prenatal Care began in First Trimester

84.8%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (81.3%), Hodgeman has a value of 84.8% which is higher and better.
KS Value
(81.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.3%), Hodgeman has a value of 84.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(77.3% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (84.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (73.5%).
Prior Value
(73.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.5%)

County: Hodgeman Percent of Births with Inadequate Birth Spacing

Current Value:
26.7%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (10.2%), Hodgeman has a value of 26.7% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.8%), Hodgeman has a value of 26.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (26.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.6%).
Prior Value
(17.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Percent of Births with Low Birth Weight

Current Value:
10.6%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (7.4%), Hodgeman has a value of 10.6% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Hodgeman has a value of 10.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.3% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (10.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Percent of WIC Mothers Breastfeeding Exclusively

Current Value:
0.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (18.2%), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (2.3%).
Prior Value
(2.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Percentage of Premature Births

Current Value:
10.6%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (10.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 10.6% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.9%), Hodgeman has a value of 10.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.9% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (10.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)

County: Hodgeman

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Poisoning (Drugs) Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
0.0
Per 10,000 population
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (1.1), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(1.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
18.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 18.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 18.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Hodgeman has a value of 18.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (18.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 14.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 14.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (14.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Frequent Mental Distress

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Frequent Mental Distress

13.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (14.4%), Hodgeman has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (13.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.2%).
Prior Value
(13.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Mental Behavior Hospital Admissions Rate

Current Value:
35.4
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (70.6), Hodgeman has a value of 35.4 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(70.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (35.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.1).
Prior Value
(30.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

13.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 13.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 13.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Hodgeman has a value of 13.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Age-adjusted Alzheimer's Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (23.3), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(23.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (29.4), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(29.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Age-adjusted Cancer Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

152.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (151.4), Hodgeman has a value of 152.8 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(151.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (158.5), Hodgeman has a value of 152.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(158.5 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (152.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (168.5).
Prior Value
(168.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)

County: Hodgeman Age-adjusted Cerebrovascular Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (35.2), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(35.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (37.6), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.6 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (64.08).
Prior Value
(64.08)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

County: Hodgeman Age-adjusted Chronic Lower Respiratory Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (47.1), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(47.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (41.6), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(41.6 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (56.8).
Prior Value
(56.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Age-adjusted Diabetes Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (25.0), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(25.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.5), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.5 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Age-adjusted Heart Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

209.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (162.0), Hodgeman has a value of 209.2 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(162.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (168.5), Hodgeman has a value of 209.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(168.5 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (209.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (198.3).
Prior Value
(198.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Age-adjusted Homicide Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (5.9), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.7), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.7 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)

County: Hodgeman Age-adjusted Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

Current Value:
842.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (795.9), Hodgeman has a value of 842.0 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(795.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (731.9), Hodgeman has a value of 842.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(731.9 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (842.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (861.5).
Prior Value
(861.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Age-adjusted Nephritis, Nephrotic Syndrome, Nephrosis Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (14.8), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(14.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.0), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Age-adjusted Suicide Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (18.5), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.3), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.3 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)

County: Hodgeman Age-adjusted Traffic Injury Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (13.6), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(13.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.4), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)

County: Hodgeman Age-adjusted Unintentional Injuries Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (48.7), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(48.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.5), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.5 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (137.5).
Prior Value
(137.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

County: Hodgeman Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Alzheimers

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (11.0), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(11.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cancer

Current Value:
857.7
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (1,176.7), Hodgeman has a value of 857.7 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(1,176.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (857.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1,046.9).
Prior Value
(1,046.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cerebrovascular Disease

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (149.9), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(149.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Chronic Lower Respiratory Disease

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (199.2), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(199.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Diabetes

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (201.3), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(201.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Heart Disease

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (899.4), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(899.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (716.7).
Prior Value
(716.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Homicide

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (264.9), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(264.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Nephritis, Nephrotic Syndrome Nephrosis

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (79.2), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(79.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Suicide

Current Value:
0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (673.8), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(673.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Traffic Injury

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (460.5), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(460.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Unintentional Injuries

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (1,198.7), Hodgeman has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(1,198.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Life Expectancy

70.8
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 70.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.8.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 70.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (77.0), Hodgeman has a value of 70.8 which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(77.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.6), Hodgeman has a value of 70.8 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
8.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 8.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 8.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (11.9%), Hodgeman has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (8.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.2%).
Prior Value
(9.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

36.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 36.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 34.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 36.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Hodgeman has a value of 36.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

43.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 43.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.1%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 43.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Hodgeman has a value of 43.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Adults 65+ with a Disability

29.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (33.6%), Hodgeman has a value of 29.5%.
KS Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Hodgeman has a value of 29.5%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
19.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (15.5%), Hodgeman has a value of 19.1%.
KS Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Hodgeman has a value of 19.1%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (5.9%), Hodgeman has a value of 5.5%.
KS Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Hodgeman has a value of 5.5%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
7.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (5.8%), Hodgeman has a value of 7.3%.
KS Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 7.3%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
7.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (11.7%), Hodgeman has a value of 7.8%.
KS Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Hodgeman has a value of 7.8%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (6.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 6.0%.
KS Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (6.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
9.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.7%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.4%), Hodgeman has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Adults who Visited a Dentist

65.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 65.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 65.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (64.8%), Hodgeman has a value of 65.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Dentist Rate

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Dentist Rate

0
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 22.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 101 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (63), Hodgeman has a value of 0 which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(63)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Percentage of Screened 3-12 Grade Students w No Dental Sealants

87.2%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (61.3%), Hodgeman has a value of 87.2% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(61.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (87.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (83.4%).
Prior Value
(83.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Percentage of Screened K-12 Grade Students w Obvious Dental Decay

4.7%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (13.8%), Hodgeman has a value of 4.7% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (4.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.8%).
Prior Value
(9.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Adults with Arthritis

29.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 29.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.6%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 29.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (25.2%), Hodgeman has a value of 29.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Adults with Kidney Disease

3.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.7%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Hodgeman has a value of 3.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 21.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 21.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (17.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 21.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 21.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (21.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (11.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (15.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (17.0%).
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

40.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 40.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 40.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (34.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 40.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 40.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (40.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (43.0%).
Prior Value
(43.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

14.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (14.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Injury Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
107.7
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (72.0), Hodgeman has a value of 107.7 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(72.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (107.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (106.9).
Prior Value
(106.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Adults with COPD

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Adults with COPD

7.4%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 7.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 7.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Hodgeman has a value of 7.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Adults with Current Asthma

9.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 9.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 9.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Hodgeman has a value of 9.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Asthma Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
13.0
Per 10,000 population
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (3.7), Hodgeman has a value of 13.0 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(3.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.

County: Hodgeman Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Asthma: Medicare Population

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (6.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 6.0%.
KS Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Hospital Admission Rate

48.1
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (9.8), Hodgeman has a value of 48.1 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (48.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (48.2).
Prior Value
(48.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman COPD: Medicare Population

19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (12.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (19.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Pneumonia (Bacterial) Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
67.6
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (20.2), Hodgeman has a value of 67.6 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(20.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (67.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.5).
Prior Value
(55.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Sexually Transmitted Disease Rate

Current Value:
1.1
Cases per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (6.7), Hodgeman has a value of 1.1 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(6.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (1.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.3).
Prior Value
(2.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Adults who Smoke

15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Hodgeman has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Hodgeman Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
2.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 2.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.8%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 2.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (2.2%), Hodgeman has a value of 2.3% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (2.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.4%).
Prior Value
(2.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

23.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (23.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.2%).
Prior Value
(25.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)

County: Hodgeman

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Frequent Physical Distress

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Frequent Physical Distress

10.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (11.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (10.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.7%).
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hodgeman Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Insufficient Sleep

30.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 30.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 30.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (33.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 30.7% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Hodgeman has a value of 30.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (30.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (33.0%).
Prior Value
(33.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

County: Hodgeman Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
10.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Hodgeman has a value of 10.9%.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Hodgeman has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hodgeman

Community

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Community

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Child Opportunity Index

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Child Opportunity Index

63.0
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (45.32), Hodgeman has a value of 63.0 which is higher and better.
KS Value
(45.32)

County: Hodgeman

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Voter Turnout: Presidential Election

Current Value:
74.9%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Hodgeman has a value of 74.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (67.4%), Hodgeman has a value of 74.9% which is higher and better.
KS Value
(67.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (74.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (71.3%).
Prior Value
(71.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (58.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(58.4%)
<div>SDOH-07: Increase the proportion of the voting-age citizens who vote</div>

County: Hodgeman

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Rate of Violent Crime per 1,000 Population

Current Value:
2.8
Crimes per 1,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (4.6), Hodgeman has a value of 2.8 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(4.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.7), Hodgeman has a value of 2.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.7 in 2015)
The Kansas State value is compared to the US value. Under reporting of crime by some public safety jurisdictions may result in lower rates.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (2.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.7).
Prior Value
(1.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Hodgeman Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Average Household Size

2.50
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (2.50), Hodgeman has a value of 2.50.
KS Value
(2.50)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Hodgeman has a value of 2.50.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Female Population

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Female Population

48.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (49.8%), Hodgeman has a value of 48.1%.
KS Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.4%), Hodgeman has a value of 48.1%.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (48.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (48.4%).
Prior Value
(48.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Foreign Born Persons

3.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (7.1%), Hodgeman has a value of 3.4%.
KS Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Hodgeman has a value of 3.4%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Households

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Households

710
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hodgeman value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Male Population

Current Value:

County: Hodgeman Male Population

51.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (50.2%), Hodgeman has a value of 51.9%.
KS Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.6%), Hodgeman has a value of 51.9%.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hodgeman (51.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (51.6%).
Prior Value
(51.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hodgeman value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hodgeman Population Age 5+ with Language Other than English Spoken at Home

6.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (11.8%), Hodgeman has a value of 6.7%.
KS Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Hodgeman has a value of 6.7%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Kansas Health Matters