Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Pratt

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Adults who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Pratt Adults who Binge Drink

16.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 16.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 16.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Pratt has a value of 16.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Percent Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Having Daily Opioid Dosage >= 50 MME

38.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (33.3%), Pratt has a value of 38.6% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (38.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (42.0%).
Prior Value
(42.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Percent Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Having Daily Opioid Dosage >= 90 MME

20.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (16.6%), Pratt has a value of 20.6% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (20.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (23.3%).
Prior Value
(23.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Percent Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Receiving Both Long & Short Acting Opioids

7.8%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (7.6%), Pratt has a value of 7.8% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (7.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Percent Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Receiving Opioid & Benzodiazepine Prescriptions

15.1%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (15.1%), Pratt has a value of 15.1%.
KS Value
(15.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (15.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Percent of Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Receiving Opioids Supply Greater Than 10-Days

46.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (37.8%), Pratt has a value of 46.6% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(37.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (46.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (46.5%).
Prior Value
(46.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Percent of Medicare Part D Claims With Opioid Prescriptions Written For More Than 10-Day Supply

73.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (71.0%), Pratt has a value of 73.9% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(71.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (73.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (72.1%).
Prior Value
(72.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

County: Pratt Adults with Cancer

8.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 8.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Pratt has a value of 8.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (11.0%), Pratt has a value of 11.0%.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Pratt has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:
81.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 81.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.6%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 81.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Pratt has a value of 81.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Colon Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Pratt Colon Cancer Screening

62.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 62.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 61.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.8%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 62.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Pratt has a value of 62.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
68.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 68.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.6%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 68.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Pratt has a value of 68.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Colorectal Cancer Rate

Current Value:

County: Pratt Colorectal Cancer Rate

30.1
Per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (39.2), Pratt has a value of 30.1 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(39.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (30.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.8).
Prior Value
(36.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Female Breast Cancer Rate

Current Value:
133.0
Per 100,000 female population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (129.0), Pratt has a value of 133.0 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(129.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (133.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (117.1).
Prior Value
(117.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Lung & Bronchus Cancer Rate

Current Value:
49.3
Per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (54.0), Pratt has a value of 49.3 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (49.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (52.4).
Prior Value
(52.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Male Prostate Cancer Rate

Current Value:
138.6
Per 100,000 male population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (109.8), Pratt has a value of 138.6 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(109.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (138.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.2).
Prior Value
(72.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:
70.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 70.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 70.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Pratt has a value of 70.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

County: Pratt Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
51.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 51.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 48.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 41.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 51.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (50.0%), Pratt has a value of 51.0% which is higher and better.
KS Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Pratt has a value of 51.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (51.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (50.0%).
Prior Value
(50.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Pratt Adults 20+ with Diabetes

9.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 9.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 9.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (9.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.4%).
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Diabetes Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
10.7
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (16.5), Pratt has a value of 10.7 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (10.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0).
Prior Value
(13.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pratt Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
25.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 25.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (24.0%), Pratt has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Pratt has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (25.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (26.0%).
Prior Value
(26.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
14.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (24.6%), Pratt has a value of 14.9% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(24.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Pratt has a value of 14.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Children with a Disability

Current Value:
3.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (4.8%), Pratt has a value of 3.3%.
KS Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Pratt has a value of 3.3%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
4.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (5.6%), Pratt has a value of 4.1%.
KS Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Pratt has a value of 4.1%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Persons with a Disability

Current Value:
13.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (13.4%), Pratt has a value of 13.2%.
KS Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Pratt has a value of 13.2%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (4.2%), Pratt has a value of 5.5%.
KS Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Pratt has a value of 5.5%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (2.2%), Pratt has a value of 2.5%.
KS Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Pratt has a value of 2.5%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (2.4%), Pratt has a value of 2.7%.
KS Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Pratt has a value of 2.7%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (6.5%), Pratt has a value of 7.2%.
KS Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Pratt has a value of 7.2%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
75.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 75.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.8%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 75.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (73.6%), Pratt has a value of 75.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:
10.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Pratt has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Average Monthly WIC Participation per 1,000 population

16.1
Average cases per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (15.0), Pratt has a value of 16.1.
KS Value
(15.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.4), Pratt has a value of 16.1.
US Value
(22.4 in 2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (16.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.1).
Prior Value
(16.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Community Spending on Health Care

Current Value:
9.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (8.6%), Pratt has a value of 9.7%.
KS Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Pratt has a value of 9.7%.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (9.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.7%).
Prior Value
(9.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pratt Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
7.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 7.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 7.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (6.8%), Pratt has a value of 7.3% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (7.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.9%).
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pratt Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
229
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 229 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 117 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 229 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (140), Pratt has a value of 229 which is higher and better.
KS Value
(140)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (229) is greater and better than the previously measured value (208).
Prior Value
(208)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
88.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 88.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 88.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (89.1%), Pratt has a value of 88.1% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (88.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (86.9%).
Prior Value
(86.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Pratt Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

2,291.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 2,291.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,745.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,428.0.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 2,291.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (2,527.0), Pratt has a value of 2,291.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(2,527.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Pratt has a value of 2,291.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (2,291.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1,758.0).
Prior Value
(1,758.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
88
Providers per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 88 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 97 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 88 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 30.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,995 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (79), Pratt has a value of 88 which is higher and better.
KS Value
(79)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (88) is greater and better than the previously measured value (87).
Prior Value
(87)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Staffed Hospital Bed Ratio

Current Value:
3.8
Beds per 1,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (2.9), Pratt has a value of 3.8.
KS Value
(2.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (3.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.8).
Prior Value
(3.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
83.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 83.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 83.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (88.2%), Pratt has a value of 83.7% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Pratt has a value of 83.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

94.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 94.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 94.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (94.2%), Pratt has a value of 94.6% which is higher and better.
KS Value
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Pratt has a value of 94.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
86.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 86.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 86.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (91.1%), Pratt has a value of 86.3% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(91.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Pratt has a value of 86.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Acute Cerebrovascular (Stroke) Disease Hospital Admission Rate

10.2
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (11.6), Pratt has a value of 10.2 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(11.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (10.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.1).
Prior Value
(10.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pratt Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:
3.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Pratt has a value of 3.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
7.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), Pratt has a value of 7.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

81.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 81.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 81.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Pratt has a value of 81.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
49.5
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 49.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 61.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 75.6.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 104 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (48.3), Pratt has a value of 49.5 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(48.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (49.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (55.3).
Prior Value
(55.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack

24.6
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 24.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (25.6), Pratt has a value of 24.6 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(25.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (24.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.8).
Prior Value
(21.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pratt Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (15.0%), Pratt has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Pratt has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (16.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (17.0%).
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

County: Pratt Cholesterol Test History

83.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 83.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.1%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 83.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Pratt has a value of 83.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Congestive Heart Failure Hospital Admission Rate

14.6
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (24.1), Pratt has a value of 14.6 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(24.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (14.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.7).
Prior Value
(18.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pratt Heart Disease Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
68.9
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (111.9), Pratt has a value of 68.9 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(111.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (68.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (77.7).
Prior Value
(77.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pratt Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (11.0%), Pratt has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Pratt has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (13.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:
37.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 37.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 37.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Pratt has a value of 37.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

County: Pratt High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:
38.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 38.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 38.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Pratt has a value of 38.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
68.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 68.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 68.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (63.0%), Pratt has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Pratt has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (68.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (67.0%).
Prior Value
(67.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
69.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 69.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 69.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 69.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (66.0%), Pratt has a value of 69.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Pratt has a value of 69.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (69.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (69.0%).
Prior Value
(69.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 23.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 23.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (21.0%), Pratt has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Pratt has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (23.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (25.0%).
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Percent of Adults with Diagnosed Hypertension

Current Value:
43.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (32.8%), Pratt has a value of 43.3% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(32.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.3%), Pratt has a value of 43.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (43.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.3%).
Prior Value
(29.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.7%)

County: Pratt Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 5.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (5.0%), Pratt has a value of 5.0%.
KS Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Pratt has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Current Value:
0.0
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.3.
KS Counties
(Sep 30, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 97 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (0.5), Pratt has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(0.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7), Pratt has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Current Value:
3.14
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 3.14 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.73 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.11.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 3.14 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.84 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.01.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (11.10), Pratt has a value of 3.14 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(11.10)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), Pratt has a value of 3.14 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (3.14) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.85).
Prior Value
(7.85)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
45.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 45.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 39.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 45.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (50.0%), Pratt has a value of 45.0% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Pratt has a value of 45.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (45.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (45.0%).
Prior Value
(45.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Percent of Infants Fully Immunized at 24 Months

72.5%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (71.1%), Pratt has a value of 72.5% which is higher and better.
KS Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (72.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (67.7%).
Prior Value
(67.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19

Current Value:
52.1%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 52.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 45.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 52.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (52.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (52.0%).
Prior Value
(52.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 4.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (7.0%), Pratt has a value of 4.0% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Pratt has a value of 4.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (4.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Pratt Infant Mortality Rate

11.3
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (5.9), Pratt has a value of 11.3 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0), Pratt has a value of 11.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0 in 2011-2015)
The five-year U.S. rate is compared to the five-year Kansas rate. The U.S. rate may be based on one or more years of preliminary statistics. Five-year time period for this value is 2010-2014, final 2015 data not available at national level, at this time.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (11.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.6).
Prior Value
(12.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)

County: Pratt Number of Births per 1,000 Population

Current Value:
11.4
Births per 1,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (11.9), Pratt has a value of 11.4.
KS Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.8), Pratt has a value of 11.4.
US Value
(11.8 in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (11.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.4).
Prior Value
(11.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Percent of all Births Occurring to Teens (15-19)

5.4%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (5.0%), Pratt has a value of 5.4% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.8%), Pratt has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (5.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.1%).
Prior Value
(5.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Percent of Births Occurring to Unmarried Women

Current Value:
33.9%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (36.4%), Pratt has a value of 33.9% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (39.8%), Pratt has a value of 33.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(39.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (33.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (33.0%).
Prior Value
(33.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Percent of births Where Mother Smoked During Pregnancy

15.1%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (7.9%), Pratt has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.9%), Pratt has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.9% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (15.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.9%).
Prior Value
(16.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Percent of Births Where Prenatal Care began in First Trimester

81.9%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (81.3%), Pratt has a value of 81.9% which is higher and better.
KS Value
(81.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.3%), Pratt has a value of 81.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(77.3% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (81.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (82.7%).
Prior Value
(82.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.5%)

County: Pratt Percent of Births with Inadequate Birth Spacing

9.0%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (10.2%), Pratt has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.8%), Pratt has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.8% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.4%).
Prior Value
(8.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Percent of Births with Low Birth Weight

Current Value:
6.4%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (7.4%), Pratt has a value of 6.4% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Pratt has a value of 6.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.3% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (6.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.3%).
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Percent of WIC Mothers Breastfeeding Exclusively

2.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (16.3%), Pratt has a value of 2.1% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (2.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (25.0%).
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Percentage of Premature Births

Current Value:
7.0%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (10.0%), Pratt has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.9%), Pratt has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.9% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)

County: Pratt

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Poisoning (Drugs) Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
5.9
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (3.5), Pratt has a value of 5.9 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(3.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (5.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.3).
Prior Value
(6.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pratt

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
18.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 18.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 18.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Pratt has a value of 18.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 23.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 23.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (18.0%), Pratt has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Pratt has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (23.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Mental Behavior Hospital Admissions Rate

Current Value:
38.8
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (70.6), Pratt has a value of 38.8 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(70.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (38.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (45.7).
Prior Value
(45.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pratt Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:
76
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 76 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 76 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 131 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,941 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (224), Pratt has a value of 76 which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(224)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (76) is less and worse than the previously measured value (77).
Prior Value
(77)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
14.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 14.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 14.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Pratt has a value of 14.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Age-adjusted Alzheimer's Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

18.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (23.3), Pratt has a value of 18.3 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(23.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (29.4), Pratt has a value of 18.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(29.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (18.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.4).
Prior Value
(26.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Age-adjusted Cancer Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

146.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (151.4), Pratt has a value of 146.1 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(151.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (158.5), Pratt has a value of 146.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(158.5 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (146.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (120.7).
Prior Value
(120.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)

County: Pratt Age-adjusted Cerebrovascular Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

38.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (35.2), Pratt has a value of 38.8 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(35.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (37.6), Pratt has a value of 38.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(37.6 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (38.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.9).
Prior Value
(30.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

County: Pratt Age-adjusted Chronic Lower Respiratory Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

49.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (47.1), Pratt has a value of 49.1 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(47.1)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (41.6), Pratt has a value of 49.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(41.6 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (49.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (62.0).
Prior Value
(62.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Age-adjusted Diabetes Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

22.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (25.0), Pratt has a value of 22.9 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(25.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.5), Pratt has a value of 22.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.5 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (22.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.2).
Prior Value
(27.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Age-adjusted Heart Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

195.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (162.0), Pratt has a value of 195.5 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(162.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (168.5), Pratt has a value of 195.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(168.5 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (195.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (180.0).
Prior Value
(180.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Age-adjusted Homicide Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (5.9), Pratt has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.7), Pratt has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.7 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)

County: Pratt Age-adjusted Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

864.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (795.9), Pratt has a value of 864.5 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(795.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (733.1), Pratt has a value of 864.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(733.1 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (864.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (801.3).
Prior Value
(801.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Age-adjusted Nephritis, Nephrotic Syndrome, Nephrosis Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

14.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (14.8), Pratt has a value of 14.1 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(14.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.0), Pratt has a value of 14.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (14.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.5).
Prior Value
(17.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Age-adjusted Suicide Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (18.5), Pratt has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.3), Pratt has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.3 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (30.6).
Prior Value
(30.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)

County: Pratt Age-adjusted Traffic Injury Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

0.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (13.6), Pratt has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(13.6)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.4), Pratt has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (26.7).
Prior Value
(26.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)

County: Pratt Age-adjusted Unintentional Injuries Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

55.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (48.7), Pratt has a value of 55.3 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(48.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.5), Pratt has a value of 55.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.5 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (55.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (65.5).
Prior Value
(65.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

County: Pratt Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Alzheimers

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (11.2), Pratt has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(11.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cancer

773.9
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (1,176.7), Pratt has a value of 773.9 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(1,176.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (773.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (628.3).
Prior Value
(628.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Cerebrovascular Disease

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (149.9), Pratt has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(149.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (322.7).
Prior Value
(322.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Chronic Lower Respiratory Disease

323.7
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (199.2), Pratt has a value of 323.7 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(199.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (323.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (407.1).
Prior Value
(407.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Diabetes

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (201.3), Pratt has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(201.3)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (504.2).
Prior Value
(504.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Heart Disease

1,121.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (899.4), Pratt has a value of 1,121.0 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(899.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (1,121.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1,030.3).
Prior Value
(1,030.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Homicide

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (264.9), Pratt has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(264.9)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Nephritis, Nephrotic Syndrome Nephrosis

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (79.2), Pratt has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(79.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (90.9).
Prior Value
(90.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Suicide

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (673.8), Pratt has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(673.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (955.1).
Prior Value
(955.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Traffic Injury

0.0
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (460.5), Pratt has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(460.5)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (1,242.4).
Prior Value
(1,242.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Age-Adjusted Years of Potential Life Lost - Unintentional Injuries

2,171.5
Years per 100,000 Population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (1,198.7), Pratt has a value of 2,171.5 which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(1,198.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (2,171.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2,304.1).
Prior Value
(2,304.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Pratt Life Expectancy

75.8
Years
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 75.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 77.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.6.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 102 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 75.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,072 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (77.8), Pratt has a value of 75.8 which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(77.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (78.5), Pratt has a value of 75.8 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (75.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (76.9).
Prior Value
(76.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Percent of Adults Who Reported Consuming Fruit Less than 1 Time Per Day

35.5%
(2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (41.4%), Pratt has a value of 35.5% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(41.4%)
The County / Region value is compared to the Kansas State value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account while making this comparision. Due to the addition of cell phones in data collection, the 2011 BRFSS results cannot be compared to results from previous years.
Compared to the US Value (37.7%), Pratt has a value of 35.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.7%)
The Kansas State value is compared to the United States value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account while making this comparision. Due to the addition of cell phones in data collection, the 2011 BRFSS results cannot be compared to results from previous years.

County: Pratt Percent of Adults Who Reported Consuming Vegetables Less than 1 Time Per Day

10.5%
(2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (22.3%), Pratt has a value of 10.5% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(22.3%)
The County / Region value is compared to the Kansas State value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account while making this comparision. Due to the addition of cell phones in data collection, the 2011 BRFSS results cannot be compared to results from previous years.
Compared to the US Value (22.6%), Pratt has a value of 10.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.6%)
The Kansas State value is compared to the United States value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account while making this comparision. Due to the addition of cell phones in data collection, the 2011 BRFSS results cannot be compared to results from previous years.

County: Pratt

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
11.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 11.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 11.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (11.9%), Pratt has a value of 11.8% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (11.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.7%).
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pratt Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

39.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 39.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 34.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 39.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Pratt has a value of 39.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

45.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 45.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.1%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 45.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Pratt has a value of 45.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:
33.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (33.6%), Pratt has a value of 33.8%.
KS Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Pratt has a value of 33.8%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
18.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (15.5%), Pratt has a value of 18.2%.
KS Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Pratt has a value of 18.2%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
6.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (5.9%), Pratt has a value of 6.1%.
KS Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Pratt has a value of 6.1%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (5.8%), Pratt has a value of 6.8%.
KS Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Pratt has a value of 6.8%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

9.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (11.7%), Pratt has a value of 9.7%.
KS Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Pratt has a value of 9.7%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (6.0%), Pratt has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Pratt has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
10.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.7%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.4%), Pratt has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:
64.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 64.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.9%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 64.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (64.8%), Pratt has a value of 64.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Dentist Rate

Current Value:

County: Pratt Dentist Rate

76
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 76 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 40 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 25.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 101 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 76 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,056 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (62), Pratt has a value of 76 which is higher and better.
KS Value
(62)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (76) is greater and better than the previously measured value (66).
Prior Value
(66)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Percentage of Screened 3-12 Grade Students w No Dental Sealants

83.1%
(2014-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (55.9%), Pratt has a value of 83.1% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(55.9%)
The data are from a convenience sample. Only those schools that participated in the statewide oral health screening program implemented by the Bureau of Oral Health to satisfy the Kansas State Statute for Annual Dental Inspection (K.S.A. 72-5201) are entered into the database. Regarding a US Value comparison and a HP2020 target, there is no direct comparison that can be made to Kansas 'No Dental Sealant' data. The national and HP2020 values are from a survey of age groups 6 to 9 and 13 to 15 years of age based on the National Health & Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), CDC, and NCHS criteria. The Kansas criteria for its data are school grade levels 3 -12. The national value and HP2020 target for 'No Dental Sealants' of age group 6 to 9 is 25.5 percent and 28.1 percent respectively and 19.9 percent and 21.9 percent respectively for age group 13 to 15.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (83.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (76.1%).
Prior Value
(76.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pratt Percentage of Screened K-12 Grade Students w Obvious Dental Decay

13.5%
(2014-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (16.5%), Pratt has a value of 13.5% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(16.5%)
The data are from a convenience sample. Only those schools that participated in the statewide oral health screening program implemented by the Bureau of Oral Health to satisfy the Kansas State Statute for Annual Dental Inspection (K.S.A. 72-5201) are entered into the database. Regarding a US Value comparison and a HP2020 target, there is no direct comparison that can be made to Kansas 'Obvious Dental Decay' data. The national and HP2020 values are from a survey of age groups 6 to 9 and 13 to 15 years of age based on the National Health & Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), CDC, and NCHS criteria. The Kansas criteria for its data are school grade levels K -12. The national value and HP2020 target for 'Obvious Dental Decay' of age group 6 to 9 is 28.8 percent and 25.9 percent respectively and 17.0 percent and 15.3 percent respectively for age group 13 to 15.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (13.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.1%).
Prior Value
(15.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pratt

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

County: Pratt Adults with Arthritis

28.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 28.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.6%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 28.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (25.2%), Pratt has a value of 28.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:
3.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 3.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.7%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 3.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Pratt has a value of 3.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (17.0%), Pratt has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Pratt has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (15.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (11.0%), Pratt has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Pratt has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (16.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Percent of Adults Who Were Ever Diagnosed with a Depressive Disorder

28.1%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (20.9%), Pratt has a value of 28.1% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(20.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (20.1%), Pratt has a value of 28.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

34.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 34.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 34.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (34.0%), Pratt has a value of 34.0%.
KS Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Pratt has a value of 34.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (34.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (37.0%).
Prior Value
(37.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

Current Value:
24.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 24.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 24.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (24.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.8%).
Prior Value
(21.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Injury Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
59.9
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (72.0), Pratt has a value of 59.9 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(72.0)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (59.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.4).
Prior Value
(66.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pratt

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Adults with COPD

Current Value:

County: Pratt Adults with COPD

7.4%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 7.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 7.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Pratt has a value of 7.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:
9.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 9.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 9.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Pratt has a value of 9.7%.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Asthma Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
2.5
Per 10,000 population
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (3.7), Pratt has a value of 2.5 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(3.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.

County: Pratt Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (6.0%), Pratt has a value of 6.0%.
KS Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Pratt has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Hospital Admission Rate

7.5
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (9.8), Pratt has a value of 7.5 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (7.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.1).
Prior Value
(11.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pratt COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (12.0%), Pratt has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Pratt has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt Pneumonia (Bacterial) Hospital Admission Rate

Current Value:
16.3
Per 10,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (20.2), Pratt has a value of 16.3 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(20.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (16.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.7).
Prior Value
(15.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pratt

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Sexually Transmitted Disease Rate

Current Value:
3.5
Cases per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (6.7), Pratt has a value of 3.5 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(6.7)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (3.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.9).
Prior Value
(3.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Pratt

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

County: Pratt Adults who Smoke

15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Pratt has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Pratt Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
2.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.8%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (2.2%), Pratt has a value of 2.4% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (2.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.6%).
Prior Value
(2.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pratt

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Pratt Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

33.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 33.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.0%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 33.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (33.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (28.0%).
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)

County: Pratt Percent of Adults who are Overweight

Current Value:
33.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (34.8%), Pratt has a value of 33.4% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.3%), Pratt has a value of 33.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (33.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.4%).
Prior Value
(37.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Pratt

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

County: Pratt Insufficient Sleep

31.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 31.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 31.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the KS Value (33.0%), Pratt has a value of 31.9% which is lower and better.
KS Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Pratt has a value of 31.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (31.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (32.8%).
Prior Value
(32.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

County: Pratt Percent of Adults Who Reported That They Always Wear a Seatbelt When They Drive or Ride in a Car

69.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (83.4%), Pratt has a value of 69.6% which is lower and worse.
KS Value
(83.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.3%), Pratt has a value of 69.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Percent of Adults with Fair or Poor Self-Perceived Health Status

18.8%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (16.7%), Pratt has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.
KS Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.7%), Pratt has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
10.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Pratt has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

15.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Pratt has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Pratt has a value of 15.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Pratt

Community

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Community

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Child Opportunity Index

Current Value:

County: Pratt Child Opportunity Index

47.3
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (45.32), Pratt has a value of 47.3 which is higher and better.
KS Value
(45.32)

County: Pratt

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Voter Turnout: Presidential Election

Current Value:
67.6%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to KS Counties, Pratt has a value of 67.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.3%.
KS Counties
The distribution is based on data from 105 Kansas counties.
Compared to the KS Value (67.4%), Pratt has a value of 67.6% which is higher and better.
KS Value
(67.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (67.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (64.1%).
Prior Value
(64.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (58.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(58.4%)
<div>SDOH-07: Increase the proportion of the voting-age citizens who vote</div>

County: Pratt

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Pratt Rate of Violent Crime per 1,000 Population

Current Value:
1.1
Crimes per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the KS Value (4.4), Pratt has a value of 1.1 which is lower and better.
KS Value
(4.4)
The regional value is compared to the Kansas State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6), Pratt has a value of 1.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.6 in 2014)
The Kansas State value is compared to the US value. Under reporting of crime by some public safety jurisdictions may result in lower rates.
Compared to the prior value, Pratt (1.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.2).
Prior Value
(2.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Pratt value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Kansas Health Matters